Some schools have restricted mobile phones? Is it a positive or a negative development?
In this contemporary era, in majority of schools around the world, students have their own mobile phones. However, nowadays many institutions have banned phones in campus. While some argue that it is a negative development as phones are essential for our safety and being connected . I quibble from them and propound that this limitation would be fruitful in long run as it will increase the learning ability and social well-being among pupils.
Restricting mobile phones in classroom itself can improve the learning. This is simple, because of non availability of such devices, there will be less distraction for teachers and educates. For instance, it has been acknowledged by many teachers that once learners have a cell phone with them, they have this constant urge of checking texts or social media updates which ultimately distract them from their studies. If these gadgets are allowed in schools, these endless distractions will draw attention away from significant educational topics which will hamper their academic performance in long run. Therefore, a blanket ban on phone usage in school surely allows students to concentrate more on their education.
In addition to this, constraining phones in school premises will enhance the social and physical well-being of the school going children. To decipher it, whenever students have the free time, they tend to interact with each other and make friends. Due to this, their social circle expands. Moreover, in their games period they play physical games like football which ameliorate their health by burning calories and blood stimulation. To exemplify, schools that have banned the phones have more athletes and social clubs than those who don’t. This is because; when cell phones are permitted pupils will spend most of their time on it and play games on it than physical ones which will make them obese. Thus, to form a fit, active and social culture, restricting mobiles by educational institutions is a positive step.
To conclude, although mobile phones are the part of modern life, I personally believe banning them in schools will be a positive development because due to this students can learn better, strengthen their friendship and engage in healthy pursuit.
- Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas in words pictures music film in whichever way they wish There should be no public or government restrictions on what they do 80
- With a growing population many people believe that we should focus on more genetically modified foods What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing this 84
- Many species of animals all around the world are on the verge of extinction Some say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying while others say that we should concentrate more on the problems of human beings Discuss both the v 89
- the cost of flying has decreased significantly over the last decade this has made overseas travel much more accessible discuss advantages and disadvantages 78
- Big companies should invest in sports and local facilities Agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ntial for our safety and being connected . I quibble from them and propound that t...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty and social well-being among pupils. Restricting mobile phones in classroom i...
^^^
Line 7, column 157, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e a positive development because due to this students can learn better, strengthen t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... because due to this students can learn better, strengthen their friendship and engage...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29494382022 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66173366198 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570224719101 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8521320547 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.882352941 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9411764706 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301942797848 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102645252984 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084703788345 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19522389856 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387912186732 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.