Teaching strategy, the founding stone of education, has been valued and even triggered heated discussion over how to boost students’ in-class productivity. In other people’s view, teachers can first let students get familiar with the recorded lecture and then help them practice the content in the video in class. From my perspective, it is beneficial because it contributes to students’ interest and efficiency.
What should be prioritized is filming the course beforehand because such early-filmed materials can help students trigger their interest. Specifically, early lectures are usually replete with introductory and general concepts, which are accessible for students to comprehend. After understanding these straightforward topics, students may find interesting ones and conduct further research on them. On the contrary, if students have to learn the topics in the class from scratch, they may have no time to scrutinize every concept because they need to concentrate and follow their teachers’ lectures in class. Moreover, studying lectures ahead of time is beneficial for students to explore more. In detail, after encountering obscure concepts in the early lecture, they can search for relevant materials on the Internet, which will further their comprehension or even stimulate them to review more. On the other hand, students’ thoughts may be limited in the classroom without access to early courses.
What should be equally discussed is that early recorded lectures, compared with on-site learning, contribute to students’ efficiency in the class by facilitating them to reduce the time they spend puzzling over the questions they come up against. To begin with, when exploring a new scope, students will confront with enormous puzzles. If they are provided with early recorded lectures, they can be exposed to questions in advance, so they can have more time to survey and deeply analyze such problems. Thus, most of their puzzles may be solved early, and the time spent on such difficulties is reduced in class. By contrast, if students are not equipped with these courses, they must devote much time to figuring out the solutions to the puzzles in the class. In addition, being provided with early lectures, students can be more concentrated on the classes. In detail, students may possibly not be able to solve all of the puzzles they encounter, so they need their teachers’ assistance to help solve them. Thus, with unsolved questions, students will be more focused on the class to avoid missing the related topics or potential answers.
To conclude, only by providing students with early recorded lectures can they reap the maximum benefits in the class.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... begin with, when exploring a new scope, students will confront with enormous puz...
^^
Line 5, column 882, Rule ID: MIGHT_PERHAPS[1]
Message: Use simply 'may', 'possibly'.
Suggestion: may; possibly
...ted on the classes. In detail, students may possibly not be able to solve all of the puzzles...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 882, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'may'.
Suggestion: may
...ted on the classes. In detail, students may possibly not be able to solve all of the puzzles...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 916, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...dents may possibly not be able to solve all of the puzzles they encounter, so they need th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, in addition, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2278.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 421.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4109263658 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85327245916 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508313539192 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 676.8 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4380271641 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.894736842 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1578947368 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73684210526 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360471120759 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13059195878 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716118342628 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258269677097 0.151304729494 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00632492799414 0.056905535591 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.