Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: One can learn a lot about another person from the books and the movies that the person likes.
Friends, in some ways, determine the live we live in, and we naturally choose them carefully. Learning about one person is the first step to make a friend with him or her, yet people do have different view about how to judge one person at the first time we meet. Some claim that from the books and the movies he or she likes, we could know a lot about one person. However, I hold a opposite opinion about such statement. We cannot judge one person only from his or her preference like books or movies.
Only from the books or the movies, we are likely to make wrong judgement. One person might have a wide range of preferences. My sister here is a good case in point. She likes to watch science fiction movies, which seems that she might be very interested in science and technology and she might be very good at math or physics. However, the real situation is totally opposite. She hates math as well as physics but is fond of literature. Therefore, just from the movies she likes, we can hardly image that literature is her favorite.
Some people read certain books or watch specific movies not because of their preference, but because they have to finish some tasks, thus, we are unlikely to gain their characteristics or personalities just from these materials. For example, when I was in the university in the first year, I was asked by my teacher in the literature class to read a poem written by Lu Xun, one of the most famous writers in our country, and then write my opinions towards. I was totally frustrated, for I hate literature extremely and I can never understanding the meaning of the writers. However, I have no choice but to do it. At first, many of my new classmates consider me as a fan of literature, but gradually they realized that I was so bad on literature and so good at math and science.
Therefore, if you want to make friends with someone, knowing what he or she likes to watch or read is not enough.
- When doing group projects, some people are allowed to choose anyone they wish for; others are allowed to choose those who think differently from them. Which do you think is more effective? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:Scientific discoveries should be shared globally, and the government should not keep them as secrets. Use specific details and examples to support your answer.. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The advice from our grandparents is no longer useful, for the world has changed so much during the past 50 years. 60
- Some university teachers prefer to record their lectures before classes. In this way, students will be familiar with the lecture in advance and teachers help students practice in classes while they are watching or listening lectures. Do you think it is an 73
- Agree or disagree: In order to success in study or job，the ability to adapt or adjust to a changing condition or circumstance is more important than having excellent knowledge of a job or in a field of study. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 381, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...a lot about one person. However, I hold a opposite opinion about such statement. ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, as to, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.4604519774 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55966654371 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519774011299 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7239041071 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7222222222 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270715067796 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084073880799 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967254897295 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150716062539 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114828251893 0.0645574589148 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.