Nowadays, newsrooms are inclined to cover negative news in contrast to positive news reporting. This surely has a great influence not only at a personal level but also at a community level. I strongly agree that the media should cover good news equally for the betterment of society.
Admittedly, the idea of focus on the issues does have its merits, including the raising awareness about the issues being faced by societies, leading to forcing the authorities to act on these issues to avoid facing public anger. Nevertheless, The gravest danger of the unbalanced coverage of negative news creates a negative mindset in the community, which are bombarded with tons of bad news on the daily basis. This may lead to a pessimistic attitude in dealing with the situation. For example, viewers may perceive that the government is not working efficiently and diligently if media only present failures as well as corruption cases against the government without mentioning its achievements.
Additionally, media houses are more interested in covering heinous crimes, which can sensationalize the masses, leading to better readers or viewers. This activity, however, may have a daunting impact on the masses. For instance, people watching murders and robbery incidents on the routine basis may feel insecure about their safety all the time, which may lead to an increased stress level and existential fears. Finally, there are many unsung heroes in the society, who mostly never make it to headlines or breaking news. This may undermine the appreciation they should receive, leading to the discouragement in spite of good deeds done by them. Sharing their story in media not only motivates them but also inspire others to work for society.
To sum up, being one of the pillars of democracy, media houses should behave responsibly for the upliftment of the society by giving enough coverage to heroes who work for a better tomorrow as well as the positive incidents which may bring a new hope to the community.
- The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies than on positive developments is harm to the individuals and the society as a whole To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- Some people believe that to protect local culture, tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 84
- Many people believe that the use of new technology improves lives of employees. Others think it is a disadvantage for them. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- Since population is rapidly increasing in the world, there is an acute shortage of houses in the big cities. Should we construct multistory buildings in the existing cities or should we develop suburbs and new cities in the countryside? Give your opinion 84
- In some countries children have very strict rules of behaviour, while in other countries they are allowed to do almost anything they want.To what extent should children have to follow rules?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fr 84
Nowadays, newsrooms are
Nowadays, newsrooms are inclined to cover negative news in contrast to positive news reporting. This surely have a great influence not only at personal level but also at community level. I strongly agree that media should cover good news equally for betterment of society.
Admittedly, the idea of focus on the issues do have its merits, including the raising awareness about the issues being faced by societies, leading to forcing the authorities to act on these issues to avoid facing public anger. Nevertheless, The gravest danger of the unbalanced converage of negative news creates a negative mindset in the community, which are bombarded with tons of bad news on the daily basis. This may lead to a pessimistic attitube in dealing with situation. For example, viewers may perceive that the government is not working efficiently and diligently if media only presents failures as well as corruption cases agaisnt the government without mentioning its achievements. Finally,
Additionally, media houses are more interested in covering henious crimes, which can sensationlize the masses, leading to better readers or viewers. This activity, however, may have daunting impact on the masses. For instance, people watching murders and robbery incidents on routine basis may feel insecure about their safety all the time, which may lead to an increased stress level and existential fears.
Finally, there are many unsung heroes in the society, who mostly never make it to headlines or breaking news. This may undermine the appreciation they should receive, leading to the discouragement in spite of good deeds done by them. Sharing their story in media not only motivates them but also inspire others to work for society.
To sum up, being one of the pillars of democracy, media houses should behave responsibly for the upliftment of the society by giving enough coverage to heroes who work for a better tomorrow as well as the positive incidents which may bring a new hope to the community.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urely have a great influence not only at personal level but also at community lev...
^^
Line 5, column 704, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut mentioning its achievements. Finally, Additionally, media houses are more inte...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, for example, for instance, in contrast, as well as, in contrast to, in spite of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16713091922 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78229897875 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568245125348 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8305182283 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.9375 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4375 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273189881748 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104486175307 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.19206509074 0.0667982634062 288% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215643966155 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.351743762967 0.056905535591 618% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.