In the last two decades, an ever-increasing population in cities has put an immense pressure on the authorities to work on a sustainable solution to address this menace.
While some people argue that we should focus on creating the vertical cities to solve the problems, others do not see it as a viable option and recommend developing suburbs instead. Both the approaches have their distinct advantages as well as disadvantages which will be discussed in this essay with concluding remarks.
On the one hand, living in a city with tons of multi-story buildings does have its own perks. In the vertical city, city dwellers often find all the amenities located in a closer distance. For example, shopping malls, hospitals, schools, and cinema are generally situated in the proximity in this model. This allows citizens to avail these facilities in a shorter time. The vertical city model focuses on redevelopment of existing buildings, leading to a limited impact on the environment. However, city-dwellers also face increased realty prices due to lack of space available. Mumbai and New York are the prime examples of this situation, forcing dwellers to pay a higher price and probably forcing them to live in a smaller apartment. More multi-story buildings mean more inhabitants living in an already congested area, putting an increased pressure on city architecture including the transport systems.
On the another hand, realty prices are more affordable in the horizontal cities. Developing suburbs has the potential to create affordable housing for all the inhabitants, especially the low-income group. This may lead to a relief in congestion in the city center if employment opportunities are also available in the suburbs. Although dwellers may have to travel greater distances to avail various facilities, they may ignore this drawback over the advantages being offered by this model. The environmental damage can also be limited by developing the suburbs provided that authorities are focused on preserving the nature.
In summary, after comparing the merits and demerits of these approaches, I opine that authorities should focus on encouraging the development of suburbs than focusing on developing multi-story buildings in the city as this tends to make the inhabitants live comfortably and with lesser stress levels.
- The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies than on positive developments is harm to the individuals and the society as a whole To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- Many people believe that the use of new technology improves lives of employees. Others think it is a disadvantage for them. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- It is becoming increasingly popular to have a year off between finishing school and going to university. What are the advantage and disadvantages of this? 56
- Some people believe that to protect local culture, tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 84
- In some countries children have very strict rules of behaviour, while in other countries they are allowed to do almost anything they want.To what extent should children have to follow rules?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fr 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 235, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...proaches have their distinct advantages as well as disadvantages which will be discussed i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, in summary, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1975.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39617486339 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02066325855 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571038251366 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8744677757 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.176470588 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5294117647 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47058823529 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218196082408 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064547499097 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526530206528 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123289808527 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021926243369 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.