There are social medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones What forms do they take Do you think that these problems outweigh the benefits

Essay topics:

There are social, medical, and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. What forms do they take? Do you think that these problems outweigh the benefits?

In today’s world, the use of mobile phones has increasingly gained popularity due to its tremendous benefits. However, some people believe that there are dire consequences that come with the excessive use of these technical devices. In my opinion, the advantages of using smartphones outweigh the drawbacks and I shall support my opinion with the following arguments.

To begin with, mobile phones provide us access to their functionalities that play significant roles in our daily lives. These functionalities range from cameras to messaging apps, chat apps, and ebooks. Frequently cited examples of these messaging apps are Facebook messengers and WeChat which enable us to connect with our friends, family, and loved ones by sharing chats, pictures, and Gifs. In the same way, these technical devices drive us to become more creative as they provide photo editing apps and video editing apps. Also, the stress and hassle of experiencing traffic just to meet and to connect with people are reduced to the barest minimum. Therefore, there is no denying that these mobile devices have become a pivotal part of our daily lives and almost everyone now owns one around the world.

People who discourage the use of mobile phones, on the other hand, are wary of isolation and loneliness. They believe that the ability to connect with the rest of the world through mobile phones from the privacy of our homes increase shut-ins and lowers social interaction. Before the era of mobile phones, people attended social gatherings to connect with friends and loved ones but these days, they just do that over the phones. For example, there is nothing more annoying than talking to people who are distracted or engrossed in their phones. They become oblivious to the fact that people want to hang out and chat. In fact, social apps like Netflix and Iroko now cater to isolated consumers. Furthermore, the opponents of smartphones opine that the use of these mobile devices are addictive and can cause physical harm like eyes sores or brain damages. They, however, recommend that people become cautious of these consequences while using their smart devices.

To conclude, I strongly assert that the benefits of using mobile phones outweigh the drawbacks. Nonetheless, we must pay attention to these drawbacks as well as explore other advanced and healthier ways of achieving social connections.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-04-22 leeeelian 73 view
Essays by user leeeelian :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ect with our friends, family, and loved ones by sharing chats, pictures, and Gifs. I...
^^^^
Line 5, column 498, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing more annoying than talking to people who are distracted or engrossed in their...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, in fact, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, in the same way, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2008.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20207253886 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61590818844 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544041450777 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1263175694 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.684210526 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3157894737 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63157894737 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254737113186 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779200113912 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514388076828 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15837230191 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304593427316 0.056905535591 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.