From the time of world war one and two, it has been observed that nuclear power is one sustainable threat and energy source in the world. However, scientific advancement in the nuclear realm looking for more optimistic results for humanity. In this essay, both perspectives of nuclear energy will be elaborated.
Firstly, we survive on a globe where energy sources are limited, hence now or than various energy conservation programs are conveyed by several organizations. For instance, fossil fuel and natural gas resources are in numbers, hence it is unpredictable till what time we have these resources. Nonetheless, it has been proved by scientists that, to produce energy from fossil we need to burn them to produce energy. In this process a huge amount of hazardous gases erupted as a by-product, these gases later affect the ozone layer structure and cause "The Green House Effect". Certainly, in this manner, nuclear energy is much cheaper and clean as it produces energy on an iterative fusion of radioactive molecules.
On the other hand, if nuclear power is not utilized in a controlled and protective environment then it can probably result in devastating situations. In fact, empirical research from the "Oxford University" ascertained that the thirty-five percent of Japanese natural land which is uncultivated, due to the after effect of the nuclear bomb attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, even their generations suffered as well for decades. Unfortunately, all developed and underdeveloped nation know the power of dominance, hence, nuclear technology is a paramount priority for self-defense and showing their strength. In fact, it is inevitable that most of the terrorist activities could be controlled with the use of such weapons.
To conclude, power is always a responsibility to be controlled and utilized with the harmony notion, and nuclear technology create a kind of peace between inhabitants alike. As a result, peace will spread around world.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, nonetheless, so, then, well, for instance, in fact, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40384615385 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13087711652 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605769230769 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6780932143 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.428571429 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216814205333 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748505601301 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630871951405 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141677657446 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629792634588 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.