Today, TV channels provide man’s sports show more than women’s sports show. Why? Should TV channel give equal time to women’s sport and men’s sport?
It is true that sports with male participants are shown on TV more regularly than those with women attendants. Although the trend is negative and roots from how we educate boys and girls from early stages, I do not think it needs to be changed.
On the one hand, I believe that sports programs for men are more focused on TV channels because their numbers of audience are outweigh that of women’s. This gap comes from the gender discrimination as we encourage boys doing much exercise while girls are encouraged to play with dolls and cooking toys at home. As a result, boys have become more interested in watching sports so that they can playing sport games better while their female counterparts may strongly favor in fashion or cooking shows with a belief that girls should be good at household chores and beautifying. Both girls and boys also believe that sports are seemingly more for men, leading to a mounting number of followers for men sports but a downward trend for women sports. As women’s sports are unattractive to wide audience, it is understandable that their on-air time on TV channels will be cut down.
However, I think it does not necessarily to balance time for two kinds of sports. We all know that TV channels live on money gained from advertising of brand name products, which explains why ads pervasively appear on viral programs with an effort of attracting as much people as they can for the product promotion. Therefore, if broadcasting time has to be shared equally between men and women’s sports, TV channels will lose their profits because there will be less people watching commercials. It is also unfair to give more time for women sports since this sport category has never attracted a wide range of followers.
In conclusion, the number of people watching men sports are always higher than that of its counterpart due to gender stereotypes. Though, it is unnecessary to give more showing time for women sports as it can cause revenue loss for publication units while the audience do not desire to change the current situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-24 | Hanachan123456789 | 67 | view |
- Nowadays it is not only large companies that can be able to make films Digital technology enables anyone to produce films Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- Nowadays many people cannot read or write What problems does this cause What measures can governments take to solve these problems 67
- The world of work is changing rapidly and people cannot depend on the same job or the same conditions of work for life Discuss the possible causes for these changes and give your suggestions on how people should prepare for work in the future 89
- Today TV channels provide man s sports show more than women s sports show Why Should TV channel give equal time to women s sport and men s sport 67
- Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skills What are the causes and suggest some possible solutions 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 127, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
...s because their numbers of audience are outweigh that of women’s. This gap comes from th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 393, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'play'
Suggestion: play
...ted in watching sports so that they can playing sport games better while their female c...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...rograms with an effort of attracting as much people as they can for the product prom...
^^^^
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ose their profits because there will be less people watching commercials. It is also...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, as to, i think, in conclusion, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85593220339 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64957446038 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536723163842 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.884229223 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.230769231 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2307692308 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435022635287 0.244688304435 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167614633325 0.084324248473 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10794261291 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268943893096 0.151304729494 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735985369442 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.