Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance such as food and housing To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Life is a basic necessity of all humans. Common people in country under persecution are deprived of all essential needs, such as food and accommodation. Those people move to neighboring countries which are financially strong and in peace. I believe that it is the moral obligation and social duty of all countries to provide basic needs to refugees from such countries.

People in countries under war and armed violence are facing serious threats to life. These circumstances are pushing them towards homelessness and starvation and consequently their lives are in danger. If we take an example of Syria, we hear news that people die because of bombardment and their houses are destroyed. They do not find any shelter to reside and starve from hunger. They are displaced and their freedom is lost so they try to move toward neighboring countries. On humanity basis, financially strong countries are socially responsible to help these needy people suffering from crisis in their home country. Developed countries have enough resources to support refugees so these countries should provide home and food to needy people to survive. For instance, USA, Canada and European countries welcome refugees and save many endangered lives.

On the contrary, criminals may also enter in the premises of host countries along with refugees. They can cause terrorism or other criminal activities such as illegal human trafficking. Resource management might also become a problem. However, saving the lives is more important and these issues can be resolved by developing well-managed refugee camps.

In conclusion, all countries have social responsibility to facilitate refugees. Wealthy countries should assist displaced people with basic living needs in their premises to save their lives.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-02-17 rhytm8910 73 view
2020-09-03 coolchris2100 78 view
2020-09-03 coolchris2100 78 view
2020-09-03 coolchris2100 78 view
2020-09-03 coolchris2100 78 view
Essays by user laalliii :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, may, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45126353791 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82492762477 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58844765343 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9031061592 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.8888888889 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3888888889 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61111111111 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231501285941 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674668842991 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058929057246 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143996419842 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382572838263 0.056905535591 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.