You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such thi

Essay topics:

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic.

Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?

Use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and with relevant evidence.

You should write at least 250 words.

"The world is my home", is a very famous saying cementing the fact that everyone belongs to the world and the world belongs to everyone. But despite this fact why we see so much disbalance around the world where Richer gets richer and Poorer gets poorer only? It is harsh but the reality of life with no solution so far to it. The following essay would share some striking features of this.

More than often we get to see, Richer countries are flourishing more than ever as they have more funds, more friends, more support at every level. Every country big or small wants to be in good books of big and Rich countries only as they are powerful like USA, making them further richer. And on the contrary, Smaller and poorer countries like Nigeria are no one's interest and hence they lack and fall backward every decade even more with no funds and help from anyone.

Clearly, there is a huge disbalance in terms of economy, growth and development around the world literally shaking the foundation of prosperous World. On one side of the world, millions of money get wasted on the surplus of food where as on the other side of the world , millions go hungry to sleep. Due to lack of funds , education and opportunities, youth of the poor countries gets disillusioned leading to no future for them or for their country. Here, wealthy countries should take the onus on their shoulders to help their counterparts i.e. poor countries for basic amenities like food and education and mitigate this huge global problem.

Certainly, just leaving the problems on the leaders of poor countries would never going to make any changes as the leaders hands are also tied and their means are limited. If richer countries help for the betterment of poorer countries by lending their support, very soon the wide gap of rich and poor may diminish leading to a much better world for everyone.

Finally, Sharing the burden of basic needs like food and education by Powerful countries would make sure that no child in the world stays hungry and uneducated leading to the great future of their countries too.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-09 mehjabin 61 view
2021-09-07 Maulik Mody 73 view
2021-09-07 krimikap 73 view
2021-03-01 Nancysachdeva 78 view
2021-02-28 Nancysachdeva 67 view
Essays by user swodha :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...money get wasted on the surplus of food where as on the other side of the world , millio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... where as on the other side of the world , millions go hungry to sleep. Due to lac...
^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...go hungry to sleep. Due to lack of funds , education and opportunities, youth of t...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, may, so, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77747252747 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40088700551 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516483516484 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.182830284 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.214285714 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92857142857 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0992887210951 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419289535761 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375940213673 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0592667521592 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208112146396 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.