The ablility to communicate with others is always be concerned by many individuals, some people believe that students in collage need more practice for speaking and they prefer to let students to take public speaking courses. Nevertheless, I think universities don’t need to add an additional requirement that students need to take public speaking courses. I will elaborate my illustration on three reasons.
First of all, enviornment in collages aleady give students an atmosphere for practicing to public speaking. A standard university have a lot of departments in it and definitely provide students stages to communicate, and eventually their communcation will develop into a spellbind speaking to public. For instance, the architecture department in a colleage usurally have many seminars for students to putout their opinion for issues about society or publicity. The topic of them envolve many aspects in public lives such as how to design a comprehencive building for public. During discussions, students will eventually enhance their speaking skill in public. However, when universities need students to submit registigation of public speaking courses, students will have less communication in their majors.
Secondly, public speaking class for every student will occupy a lot of resources of universities, both in financial and academy. A university always has a large number of students, letting them to take a speech lessons will be a frustrating thing for finacial department in the university. On the other hand, school need to prepare a soficicated schedule for students, which is a totally waste of many students and staffs’ time. Some students need to have a lot of time to practice such as taking a volunteer activity or be an intern in company in their major. Taking a public speech class will disrupt their plan.
Finally, some people may give an illustration that a requirment for students’ public speaking courses can give students more chance in career development. Unfortunatly, the result of classes may have somewhat benificial but they can not make students more confidence in future job finding or businiss practicing. A success person in career field need many good divisions, skill of expression in public just a single aspect in judgements of a person. Employer need to concern more about a person and give a fairly statement. Just focusing on how to describe an issue well is not enough for career enhancement in future life.
In conclusion, a proposal for some teaching agenda need a lot of discussion and conversation in society and it is a vary complex issue to give the best choice. However, I believe that a public talking class is unnessisary for students, universities and society. The resources need to be tapped into truly important fields.
- 1 If you are required to give feedback about your classmates colleagues work or performance would you like to give positive comments or negative comments first 85
- Which do you prefer with the same rate of pay an interesting and challenging job with less vacation or a job with more vacation time but less fun 70
- recording wedding or graduation events 73
- 1 If you are required to give feedback about your classmates colleagues work or performance would you like to give positive comments or negative comments first 81
- Which one of the following qualities do you think is the most important for determining whether a friendship between two people will last a long time Why They always help each other in a crisis or when something goes wrong They have similar interests and 88
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: ADD_AN_ADDITIONAL[1]
Message: This phrase might be redundant. Use simply 'add a requirement'.
Suggestion: add a requirement
...ess, I think universities don’t need to add an additional requirement that students need to take public speak...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ly their communcation will develop into a spellbind speaking to public. For instance, the a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...al and academy. A university always has a large number of students, letting them to take a speech...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('totally') instead an adjective, or a noun ('waste') instead of another adjective.
...cicated schedule for students, which is a totally waste of many students and staffs’ time. Some...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 505, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('fairly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('statement') instead of another adjective.
...to concern more about a person and give a fairly statement. Just focusing on how to describe an is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 115, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...n and conversation in society and it is a vary complex issue to give the best choice. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2357.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29662921348 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03788642731 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483146067416 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 745.2 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.728217718 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.136363636 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2272727273 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22727272727 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203966741877 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730832430288 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575885628293 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128536748483 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455365665437 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: ADD_AN_ADDITIONAL[1]
Message: This phrase might be redundant. Use simply 'add a requirement'.
Suggestion: add a requirement
...ess, I think universities don’t need to add an additional requirement that students need to take public speak...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ly their communcation will develop into a spellbind speaking to public. For instance, the a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...al and academy. A university always has a large number of students, letting them to take a speech...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('totally') instead an adjective, or a noun ('waste') instead of another adjective.
...cicated schedule for students, which is a totally waste of many students and staffs’ time. Some...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 505, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('fairly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('statement') instead of another adjective.
...to concern more about a person and give a fairly statement. Just focusing on how to describe an is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 115, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...n and conversation in society and it is a vary complex issue to give the best choice. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2357.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29662921348 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03788642731 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483146067416 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 745.2 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.728217718 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.136363636 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2272727273 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22727272727 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203966741877 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730832430288 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575885628293 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128536748483 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455365665437 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.