2.Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: children should be required to help with household tasks as soon as they are able to do so?

Essay topics:

2.Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: children should be required to help with household tasks as soon as they are able to do so?

For many children, doing the household is one of the primary lessons in their daily life. But some interesting discussions are arising in public. Some people think it may leave a lot burden on children, nonetheless, from my point of view, it is still of vital necessity for children to help to do chores within their ability as soon as possible, and I will use some examples and reasons to elaborate my point in the following paragraphs.

First of all, helping do household can establish a close connection with their family members. When a child is asked to do the chores, the family partners will not just sit by and watch. On the contrary, they will accompany and do it together. Many families lose the warmth and harmony in modern society, and many family members just play with iPods or phones, which deprive their chance to communicate with each other. In fact, doing the household together can do a favour in changing that situation. A piece of news I read recently will aptly prove my point. In a primary school in China, students were asked to help do the household with their parents every day. The conclusion showed that the students who kept doing chores with their parents together had a better family relationship, given fantastic feedback from their parents. On the contrary, students who put away the household will have a poor performance in their family.

What’s more, the skills of doing household play an essential role in their independent life in the future. Without any doubt that the children will leave their parents and live their own life. Before that come to the true, children should gain necessary skills and commonsense of daily life, and the more you practice, the more expert you will be. A good case just at this point is that when I was a child, I always refused to do the household and forgot to do it until the to-do list piled up like a hill. So, while I first left home to the university and started living on my own, I knew nothing about the household but the knowledge from textbooks. My life there is off the rails, and everything is a mass. As a result, the lack of practice made my life a little more difficult than classmates who had gained a lot of experience and I had to spend a lot of extra time trying to make my life get back on the track. I have to admit that if I didn’t escape from doing household, I would adapt to university life more easily.

Summing up, it is essential that making requirement for children to do a favour of household as soon as possible, and the more they practice, the more advantage they will take of it. It is not only because they can build a connection with the family and let them gain daily life skills, but also improve their tenacity and patience.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-11-22 quanjun 73 view
2018-11-22 quanjun 73 view
2018-11-22 quanjun 73 view
2018-11-22 quanjun 73 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user quanjun :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 935, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ave a poor performance in their family. What's more, the skills of doing ho...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, nonetheless, so, still, while, in fact, as a result, first of all, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2259.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 493.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58215010142 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51228318535 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486815415822 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 711.0 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.125640854 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.681818182 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4090909091 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95454545455 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306006358456 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959430900822 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068270933389 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189977038061 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357700769882 0.0645574589148 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.