The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Generally speaking, in the current state of affairs we see, where the society's members definitely need to vent themselves in any way, it is safe for one to assume that being happy plays a pivotal role to that end. However, what work is better for people to have more pleasure has been a great controversy in recent years. There is a rather prevalent idea about this issue stating that keeping a relationship with a few friends is so important for being happy than making new friends. I personally agree with it. In what follows, I attempt to substantiate the idea further by focusing on two fundamental reasons.
The most imperative reason coming to mind is that the relationship strengthens between them, thereby making more communication. They regularly see each other that it provides two advantages for them. First, they have a better feel about themselves that can help them in the family’s conflictions. For example, when a husband has conflicted with his wife, it is more likely that the wars between them are autonomously solved when they decide to go for a party in which have been invited by their friends. Second, they can rely on their friends very much in difficult conditions. For instance, it is highly seen that someone has needed a little money for buying a house because of not having enough money. Nonetheless, one’s old friends have helped one by borrowing some money. Nevertheless, do rarely we see that new friends have aimed to one in a troublesome circumstance.
Another interesting point which deserves some point here is that more free time is available for the people. They can spend their time with family or for themselves. If they spend time for family, their families will get more happiness and perceiving a real concept of being together. Some notable example of this can be consisted of going to the park, going to a shopping center and so on. Even they can have been their time with children for learning a lot of key features that will be useful for the future. Furthermore, if people assign their time for themselves, they would progress in their works. Consequently<span class="hiddenSuggestion" pre="a "></span>, they make more money for buying home, car, etc. The money is very principal for them because of giving more self-confidence to them. According to this, free time can be used for a variety of works that result in more advantages not only for the individuals but also for their families.
In summary, taking all the aforementioned into consideration, one can presume that being happy for maintaining friendships with a small group is due to being strong a relationship between them as well as having more leisure time not only for themselves but also for their families. Thus, it is recommended more and more people care about this issue for having a pleased life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- TPO 51- strange behaviors of elephants 78
- TPO-53: taxes on cigarettes 85
- It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 85
- The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 613, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by focusing on two fundamental reasons. The most imperative reason coming to min...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 801, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually put before the verb 'do'.
Suggestion: rarely do
... by borrowing some money. Nevertheless, do rarely we see that new friends have aimed to o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 605, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...es, they would progress in their works. Consequently ^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 668, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...='hiddenSuggestion' pre='a '>, they make more money fo...
^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ividuals but also for their families. In summary, taking all the aforementione...
^^^
Line 7, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t this issue for having a pleased life.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, in summary, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2379.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 477.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98742138365 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14004414021 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513626834382 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 733.5 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4905884764 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.125 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235549900322 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756923814164 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532637930743 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168082965769 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408121536575 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.