Agree or Disagree: Asking children to work in a small group is the best way to teach young children
Each period of life has its own features which makes them crucial. The importance of childhood is the human’s capabilities in order to learn new things. There are controversial debates on the best approaches that improve the productivity of the kids while they are learning. A plethora of people is in the conviction that working in a group is very helpful strategy for better understanding of the children. Contrary to this popular belief, there are those who argue that other methods which have focused on the individuals skills are more beneficial. I am of the opinion that, being a group is more comfort with today’s societies, and the following explanations will further elaborate on this perspective.
First and foremost, one of the primary purposes of establishing education system is guide the students abilities in order to take appropriate steps in line with their interest. Undoubtedly, each person has particular strength or weakness points that determine their path of their life. When children work in a group, a specific project or target assign to the team; therefore, each child accept one aspect and task which are suitable for him. Meanwhile some of them may prefer to organize and lead the team; others may want to be follower. Also, among those follower or leaders children, each of them take one task. Consequently, working in a group let the students that recognize their abilities. Moreover, the children can learn from each other if they work in a team. It means that although the one who are in one team cooperate with each other in order to achieve to the determined goal, they learn how to compete with the ones who are in other groups. These principals play the crucial role in children’s growth.
Another vital fact that should be taken into consideration is that working in a group teaches imperative concepts of life. For instance, victor and failure are accounted as fundamental humanity issues which are not defined for most of the people. There are majority of people who always try to be winner and have unacceptable behaviors and attitude when they are loser. When children participate in a group at early ages they get acquainted with these basic facets of life. They learn that lose is an integral part of each life, and the important matter is how to deal with the circumstance. Either taking a step back and giving up, or working hard and go forward are the choices that bring different consequences. In addition, they learn winning is not the only acceptable result and a more significant element is cooperation between the teammate which lead to success.
On the basis of the points mentioned above, I am convinced that taking part in a group provides variety of advantages for children. This method not only assists the kids that follow their capabilities but also teaches them some skills which are far practical in their life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-30 | AJ720 | 88 | view |
| 2022-12-30 | Alfaromeo | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-17 | syuku | 62 | view |
| 2020-03-17 | zhaodejian | 76 | view |
| 2019-02-20 | Orange Dots | 73 | view |
- Some people think that governments should spend as much money as possible on developing or buying computer technology. Other people disagree and think that this money should be spent on more basic needs. Which one of these opinions do you agree with? Use 73
- A/D: Parents should give school-age children money as reward for getting a high mark in their schools. 70
- It is important for children to learn the difference between wrong and right t an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn the distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What sort of punishment should parents and chi 80
- A/D? Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 73
- Increasingly, robots and computers are being used to do work that humans once had to do for themselves. Some people believe the effect of this change will be mostly positive and helpful for humans. Other people believe that robots and computers will take 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 443, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...ct and task which are suitable for him. Meanwhile some of them may prefer to organize and...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 552, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this follower' or 'those followers'?
Suggestion: this follower; those followers
...rs may want to be follower. Also, among those follower or leaders children, each of them take ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'majorities'?
Suggestion: majorities
...fined for most of the people. There are majority of people who always try to be winner a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...viors and attitude when they are loser. When children participate in a group at earl...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 740, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to win'.
Suggestion: to win
...t consequences. In addition, they learn winning is not the only acceptable result and a...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'for instance', 'in addition']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.231910946197 0.229887763892 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.161410018553 0.158761421928 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0779220779221 0.0866891130778 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0445269016698 0.046263068375 96% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0408163265306 0.0685040099705 60% => OK
Prepositions: 0.126159554731 0.118717715034 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0333951762523 0.0351676179071 95% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.77021276901 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0222634508349 0.0309702414327 72% => OK
Particles: 0.00185528756957 0.00188951952338 98% => OK
Determiners: 0.109461966605 0.0887237588012 123% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00927643784787 0.0209618222197 44% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.038961038961 0.0139019557991 280% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2890.0 2387.08602151 121% => OK
No of words: 484.0 408.028673835 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.97107438017 5.86048508987 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.48200974243 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.326446280992 0.338922669872 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.25826446281 0.251872472559 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.183884297521 0.174417080927 105% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.130165289256 0.112833075102 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77021276901 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52479338843 0.524397521467 100% => OK
Word variations: 62.3158416698 59.2087087015 105% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6684587814 116% => OK
Sentence length: 20.1666666667 20.5533526081 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1944764063 48.84282405 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.416666667 120.699889404 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.5533526081 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.644075263715 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.54480286738 90% => OK
Readability: 45.9931129477 45.7405998639 101% => OK
Elegance: 1.58646616541 1.45489161554 109% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298049639574 0.300154397459 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.081817969367 0.103427244359 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0580990180733 0.0752933317313 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.468386640738 0.497263757937 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.127545717202 0.151897553556 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116483796235 0.114077575197 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656530105281 0.0781384742642 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.407061156003 0.336927656856 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0794517316391 0.067059652881 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214012408274 0.210909579961 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681101774881 0.0618886996521 110% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8870967742 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.91756272401 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 13.0 8.42114695341 154% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.6433691756 139% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.