Are parents good teachers?
I believe that in principle, the parents are relatively the best teachers for their children, if they are qualified enough for upbringing the children and being a good role model. However, this is not the case for all parents. Some of them are not only a good teacher, but also a bad role models. I will elaborate it in the following paragraphs.
First of all, the parents are the first care takers of the children. The children live with them during the infancy, childhood and adolescence. These are the critical stage of the children psycho-social development. Even though, the children will attend kindergarten and schools and would be under influence of the school teachers, caregivers of the kindergarten, but it is the parents that are the main source of securing emotional, social and financial needs of them. The children are dependent on them. The children love them and loved by them. So, the parents are the only people whose behaviors would be imitated, and learned by children. The school teachers are influencing the children but it is limited because of the time limitations and their limited interactions.
Secondly, since the children are born and raised in the family it is the parents who knows them better than anybody else. They know their children strength and weaknesses, their potentials, interests, capabilities and abilities. So, based on this knowledge of them, and their sensitivity and concerns on their children, they would try to be the best and right people to prescribe the methods of upbringing the children. For example, the teachers in schools are for only a certain and limited amount of time with the children, while the parents are always with the children.
The limitation of the parents as teachers: on the other hand, all of parents are not good role models, and teachers. Some of them are illiterate, some of them are not sensitive and are indifferent toward their children, some of them are addicted and with habits. Therefore, these parents not only are not good teachers, but also a bad role model.
Therefore, in principle the parents can be the best teachers, because they are the first and most important and influential role models, and their knowledge on their children strength and weaknesses and opportunities and limitations. However, all of the parents cannot be a good teacher, as they are not qualified for upbringing their children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-11 | Nina Tsarevich | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | M.A.Arefee | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | mghcivil | 90 | view |
| 2019-05-18 | mghcivil | 80 | view |
| 2019-05-05 | handsomepot | 83 | view |
- Why people attend college and university? 73
- Some people think that governments should spend as much money as possible on developing or buying computer technology. Other people disagree and think that this money should be spent on more basic needs. Which one of these opinions do you agree with? Use 70
- Are parents good teachers? 73
- Why people attend college and university? 73
- Not everything that is learned is contained in books Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books In your opinion which source is more important Why Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aborate it in the following paragraphs. First of all, the parents are the first ...
^^^^^
Line 15, column 244, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...opportunities and limitations. However, all of the parents cannot be a good teacher, as th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ualified for upbringing their children.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 13.8261648746 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2014.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07304785894 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78396679264 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.395465994962 0.524837075471 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.9 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0708576309 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9047619048 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9047619048 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47619047619 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256788036888 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987041221017 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114629877546 0.0737576698707 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195854191781 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787295606429 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.