The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide
In today's hectic life, everybody has to be in rush so as to not to be left behind in contending for the "field of competition”, and they work more and more in order to achieve their goals. In this regard, traveling enjoys a pivotal role in relieving their tired spirits. With this in mind, some people believe that it stands to reason that it is better for one to travel in a group led by a tour guide, while others hold the opposite. I, personally, subscribe to the latter attitude for quite a few reasons, three of the most substantial of which are elaborated upon hereunder.
The most compelling reason is that while individuals travel without a tour, they enjoy more freedom, which leads to enjoy more from travel. It is crystal clear that different people have various interests and tastes, and as a result one may be interested in a place, while others do not, or one may want to spend more time in visiting one place in comparison with others. Moreover, travel without a tour gives an individuals a chance to select his or her companions, whom have similar interests with us, instead of tolerating boring, rude, and reckless companions.
Another interpretation as to why I do not concur with the latter perspective in the introductory paragraph lies in the fact that one can reach the benefit of scheduling travel plan so that one can learn new things. For example, in order for planning appropriately, one should be aware of prerequisite of travel and search for recreational places, route maps, climate condition, and historical places, which all increase one's knowledge. As a point in view, last year, my friend and I decided to travel Turkey without a tour. So, we both searched a lot to in order to find places and restaurants that we both liked, which helped us not only had a fantastic travel, but also learn a great deal of thing about Turkey.
Last but not the least reason is that given the existing economic situation, people should be more conservation in spending their fortune, and striving to save their money in order to spend them in serious issues. Nowadays, travel with a tour is often costly, and people are required to pay any ordinary charge of their travel. Accordingly, travel without a tour not only is economical, but also gives one an opportunity to travel more.
In summary, having considered all the aforementioned ingredients discussed above, I firmly endorse my point of view that even though travel with a tour has several privileges, the merits of traveling without a tour outweigh those of travel with a tour on the grounds that one can enhance his or her general information, have more freedom, and decrease his or her travel expense.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-11 | Pham Ngoc Anh | 76 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | AJ720 | 88 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-02 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ectic life, everybody has to be in rush so as to not to be left behind in contending for...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 410, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an individual' or simply 'individuals'?
Suggestion: an individual; individuals
.... Moreover, travel without a tour gives an individuals a chance to select his or her companion...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'while', 'as to', 'for example', 'in summary', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.22138836773 0.229887763892 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.140712945591 0.158761421928 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0731707317073 0.0866891130778 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0525328330206 0.046263068375 114% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0506566604128 0.0685040099705 74% => OK
Prepositions: 0.140712945591 0.118717715034 119% => OK
Participles: 0.0356472795497 0.0351676179071 101% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.81081995005 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0337711069418 0.0309702414327 109% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0825515947467 0.0887237588012 93% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0131332082552 0.0209618222197 63% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0112570356473 0.0139019557991 81% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2700.0 2387.08602151 113% => OK
No of words: 464.0 408.028673835 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81896551724 5.86048508987 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48200974243 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.340517241379 0.338922669872 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.234913793103 0.251872472559 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.159482758621 0.174417080927 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.112068965517 0.112833075102 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81081995005 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.524397521467 99% => OK
Word variations: 60.2015864451 59.2087087015 102% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6684587814 73% => OK
Sentence length: 30.9333333333 20.5533526081 151% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.6995644187 48.84282405 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.0 120.699889404 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.9333333333 20.5533526081 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.644075263715 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 54.4247126437 45.7405998639 119% => OK
Elegance: 1.63076923077 1.45489161554 112% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379666426528 0.300154397459 126% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.101989460331 0.103427244359 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0310750008935 0.0752933317313 41% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.574416251705 0.497263757937 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.153516214005 0.151897553556 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163877535042 0.114077575197 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836359370584 0.0781384742642 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.317933375849 0.336927656856 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0492817482279 0.067059652881 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251285854875 0.210909579961 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736490274594 0.0618886996521 119% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.91756272401 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 11.0 8.42114695341 131% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.6433691756 103% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.