A/D: It is more important for the government to spend money on art museums and concert halls than on recreational facilities such as swimming pools and playgrounds.
Some people think that the government should spend money on recreational facilities such as swimming pools and playgrounds. However, I think that the government should spend money on art museums and concert halls. Accordingly, I strongly agree with the statement for the following reasons.
First of all, education plays a vital role in the official, and using money on art museum and concert halls is helpful to education. For example, if Taipei city government spends money on art museums, teachers can tour students to observe painting in the museum during the art class. Furthermore, for spending money on concert halls, students who major in music can have a chance to perform in the halls. As a result, students can learn more on the museums and accumulate experience on performance in the concert halls. Nevertheless, if the official spends money on recreational facilities such as swimming pool, these facilities does not educate people but have fun. What’s more, some students might not pay more attention on their academic performance due to funny playgrounds. Apparently, recreational facilities have disadvantages on education.
Secondly, reputation also plays an essential role in the government, and paying money on art building can help the government obtain a higher reputation. For example, if the government spends money on art museums, people might think the government highly focus on culture and art. Additionally, for buliding concert halls, some famous singer such as Mayday or Burno Mars will advertise that the halls is attributed to the government. As a consequence, all the citizens in Taiwan will think the government is capable and always put itself in citizen’s feeling.
Last but not least, people’s health plays an important role in the government, and spending money on art museum and concert halls can improve people’s health. For instance, if the official arranges more money on art museums, people can go to the museums after work for relaxing. In addition, for concert halls, people could also comfort their mind via listening the music on the spot. Hence, people would find peace in their life and get a good mental health. Nonetheless, if the government pays money on recreational facilities, people cannot find peace because of noise. Besides, some people might harm on the playgrounds in the process of sport games. Obviously, the facilities would not improve people’s health.
In conclusion, I strongly suggest that the government should spend money on art museum and concert halls rather than recreational facilities. After all, education, reputation, and people’s health are important for the government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-14 | kevin1105 | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-17 | Doralin | 76 | view |
| 2022-11-11 | ctoluwasedaniel | 76 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | meliiw_amd | 90 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | hazrat | 76 | view |
- A city is trying to decide what to do with a large building that has become available in order to make it useful for city residents Which ONE of the following solutions would you recommend Why 1 Develop the building into housing for people who have low in 73
- It is important to have rules about the kind of clothing people should wear to go to work and school Do you agree or disagree with this statement 71
- Genetic modification a process used to change an organism s genes and hence its characteristics is now being used to improve trees Through genetic modification it is possible to create trees that produce more fruit grow faster or withstand adverse conditi 80
- It is important for everyone to know about what is happening all around the world even though the events have not affected our daily life Do you agree or disagree with this statement 71
- A D It is more important for the government to spend money on art museums and concert halls than on recreational facilities such as swimming pools and playgrounds 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, besides, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, after all, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 43.0788530466 28% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.0752688172 322% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2256.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38424821002 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89440069438 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441527446301 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 657.0 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1336792483 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.0869565217 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2173913043 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7826086957 5.45110844103 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.523619302933 0.236089414692 222% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15663670386 0.076458572812 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109506088377 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.336864485496 0.150856017488 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780095773788 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.