A company plans to give money to either improve the environment or promote the arts. Which plan do you think is the better use for the money? Use examples to explain the answer.
Many people have their own choice that they can live their life enjoying any aspects or value of components of life. I support environment is an ineffably precious part of nature. If any company have enough fund where they want to donate their part, because of several reasons I would definitely choose and request to donate on improving numerous components of environment as we can see surrounding around us are unnoticeably dilapidating.
Firstly, environment around our ambience is inseparable part of earth which is likely to attract its every element. Having tremendously intrinsic aesthetical value as well as its comely nature, many people as well as animals or creatures get immense pleasure from the beautiful aspect of environment. When it comes the point about to manage the ecosystem single disturbance in any components will lead overpopulation and direct impact on living beings. Also in addition, fabulously organized environment prevailing around is always a source of food to protect human from food insecurity.
And secondly, environment is always considered as home and habitats of score of creature residing under the same sky. For their life to perpetuate one should not misuse components of environment as well as should suggest any companies to donate on this aspect. Well managed environment is always a property of any country. Management of environment directly supports or allows proper use of natural resources. For instance, for countries having huge amount of non renewable resources it becomes imperative to conserve. And the best conservation can only be achieved through best ultimate improvement of environment.
But for some reasons environment are not all truly important elements to be managed keeping arts apart. Art of any elements carries separate value in human life. As there are many architectural designs and landmarks around us at various parts of world. Such buildings indicate the development and improvement of extra ordinary human mind.
So last of all, because of many reasons I would like to deliver that improving environment will lead to surprising development of community and country as well as it helps to fetch prestigious mark in history.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-15 | Subash Devkota | 88 | view |
| 2018-09-14 | Subash Devkota | 76 | view |
- A company plans to give money to either improve the environment or promote the arts. Which plan do you think is the better use for the money? Use examples to explain the answer. 88
- A company plans to give money to either improve the environment or promote the arts. Which plan do you think is the better use for the money? Use examples to explain the answer. 76
- A person whose monument you want to build in your country with reasons. 81
- Some people think government should spend as much money as possible exploring outer space for example, travelling to moon and other planets. Other people disagree and think government should spend for our basic needs on earth. 90
- Students these days should stay with their parents or independent to pursue their study. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'reasons'' or 'reason's'?
Suggestion: reasons'; reason's
...ovement of environment. But for some reasons environment are not all truly important...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1864.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 347.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37175792507 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98675886489 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585014409222 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7045559996 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.555555556 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2777777778 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102681882773 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345940458278 0.076458572812 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280850788101 0.0737576698707 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0573660733752 0.150856017488 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331140918133 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.