Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
This question presents an arbitrary choice regarding the form of friendship. Some people incline to build a long-lasting friendship with small number of people while some tend to build a wide-spreading one with various and numerous people. As far as I am concerned, my own preference and experience have led me to conclude that sustain a consistent friendship with a group of people makes me happier.
To begin with, hanging out with friends I am familiar with relieve myself more, since we realize the personality and emotion of each other. By contrast, every time going out with the friend I know recently, I am afraid of saying something improper or behave something rude for him. As a result, I enjoy getting along with acquaint friend more.
Furthermore, the less time the relationship cost, the more likely that this relationship will break. In most of time, it is not because we fight or argue with each other, we may just lose the connection. Despite the truth that it recurred every time I started a new step of my life, such as the graduation, it made me grieve deeply when I notice I lose connection with someone. Consequently, I personally prefer the make relationship with few people, which I can sustain, in order to avoid the sorrow I have suffered.
Finally, intimate friendship with others is essential for me, for I consider that to be a friend of all is to be a friend of none. If no one is close to me, the loneliness will haunt around me. Owing to this, I often contact with the friends who I may not be acquaint actively, hoping we can build a more intimate friendship. The more easily a friendship can lose without connection, the more I value my friends. As a result, it indicates that a friendship over a long period of time is more suitable for me.
Given the reasons above, I firmly believe that maintaining the friendship with small number of people contributes more happiness for me. This is not to say the opposite choice is without merits, for example, you can know different kinds of people. However, I believe I have substantiated reason to support my point of view.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 470, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...indicates that a friendship over a long period of time is more suitable for me. Given the r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, while, for example, such as, as a result, i am afraid, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72899728997 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80546581433 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523035230352 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0346591681 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9444444444 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325337859389 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106920921353 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734984355883 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185785930589 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337808389506 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.