Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
There is always controversy as to whether the ability to make a lot of friends is better or the ability to keep friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time. Some people believe that all of us should have several friends and having many friends help us live in a better way. In contrast, there are a great number of people who insist on thoroughly opposite idea. Personally, I subscribe to the idea that the ability to protect friendships with a small group of close friends is more important. In what follows, I will elaborate my point of view.
First of all, it is generally agreed that old friends are more reliable. All of us have a group of old friends who are helping us in hard situations of our life. Since old friends are more intimate with each other, they more take care of each other. Moreover, whenever and wherever you need them they come to help you. However, when a person has a lot of friends he cannot account on each of them because most of them are not sympathetic to him. For instance, my father has an old friend and their friendship goes back to twenty years ago. They help each other unconditionally and without any exception. If you do not know they are friends, you will feel they are brothers because they act like brothers to each other. Therefore, it seems obvious that a small group of old friends is more beneficial.
Another equally significant point to be mentioned is that you can spend better time with your old friends. Thanks to a long friendship, old friends have a lot in common; therefore, they can spend their free time with each other and enjoy. Furthermore, when you are boring, always your old friend is the first person that comes to your mind to call him or her because you know that they will never reject your demand and they are best persons for hanging out with you. Besides, recent studies illustrate that people who have more in common feels more convenient when they spend time with each other. Thus, having more common ethics help people to have a better feeling with each other.
In conclusion, the ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people is one of the most important parts of every people life. Old friends are more reliable and make you feel better; thus maintaining them close to you has paramount importance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 60
- integrated task 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Businesses should hire employees for their entire life 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There is always controversy as to whethe...
^^
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
There is always controversy as to whether the ability to make a lot of friends is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...or the ability to keep friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time. Some...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...th a small number of people over a long period of time. Some people believe that all of us sho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ws, I will elaborate my point of view. First of all, it is generally agreed tha...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oup of old friends is more beneficial. Another equally significant point to be ...
^^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'are the best'.
Suggestion: are the best
... will never reject your demand and they are best persons for hanging out with you. Besid...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have a better feeling with each other. In conclusion, the ability to maintain f...
^^^
Line 4, column 60, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...he ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people is one of the most important par...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, you know, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58795180723 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41570801868 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448192771084 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 579.6 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9231120441 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6666666667 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7619047619 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33875814549 0.236089414692 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115730260124 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10446155761 0.0737576698707 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258167850545 0.150856017488 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0972503460966 0.0645574589148 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.