Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
As the famous proverb says, "History is the mirror of the future". Grounded on this proverb, since the dawn of the civilization, studying history played a prominent role in the progress of nations. In this sense, there is a heated controversy about studying history in universities. Despite the arguments asserting that history classes are a waste of time and energy, I believe otherwise, maintaining that students, regardless of their field of study, must attend the history classes. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into two motives to elaborate my standpoint.
First and foremost, the crux of the matter lies in the fact that studying history can be informative to the student in the face of the future predicaments. University students, as the pioneers of the society, have the fate of the nation in their hands. Accordingly, students must possess practical information and skills, namely, ability of analyzing, planning, hardworking and to the like. In this sense, one of the most powerful tools is the history. By studying history and stories of victory and failure of individual in the course of the time, one can obtain the ability of detailed analyzing events, plan a prosperous strategy, and find a guide for the future problems. Moreover, history is repetitive in nature, consequently, the study of history brings about the fact that in this ever-shifting world, the winner is who learn from history to do not make a mistake twice. There are a copious number of examples in the course of the history about kings and leaders who were doomed to failure due to the ignoring the invaluable guide, history.
Another salient point in corroborating my stance in this subject is that studying history requires the student to use both brain's hemisphere, and as a result, brings about a better efficiency. Due to the fact that in universities every student concentrates on a narrow field of science, their brain grows biased. In fact, they are unable to have different approaches toward problems, and based on their fields of study, their minds are orientated in one direction. However, by studying history, not only does their mood will change, but the history will equip them with new skills and attitudes. Take my personal experience as an example. Based on my field of study, history is not in my daily life routine. However, in a class at university, a professor introduced a history book about ancient Egypt and explained how studying a book about people lived thousands years ago help to develop new ideas even in the field of chemical engineering. This new attitude helped me do not insist on my former attitude and try to look to the problem in a different way.
To put it briefly, all the enumerated points above converge to the significance of studying history for university students due to the facts that history is informative and brings about new insight into problems. It is recommended that universities encourage students to attend in history classes enjoy benefits of this invaluable phenomenon.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'brains'' or 'brain's'?
Suggestion: brains'; brain's
...istory requires the student to use both brains hemisphere, and as a result, brings abo...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1038, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...attitude and try to look to the problem in a different way. To put it briefly, all the enumerated...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, briefly, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 87.0 52.1666666667 167% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2537.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 501.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06387225549 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89008584731 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497005988024 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 815.4 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9947405449 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.318181818 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7727272727 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.59090909091 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242059198127 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698152917364 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035771662843 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150903896032 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218410306693 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.