Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Spending at least 8 hours per day, makes the workplaces to a momentous factor in people lives. Every human being tries his or her best to find a proper job for a same motive: money! Rarely are the people satisfied with their job and it is not exaggeration to say that the routine to do the same task can be the main factor. Despite the arguments asserting that by doing the same job, the worker will be a skillful person, I believe otherwise, maintaining the fact that an experiencing different tasks at workplace, due to some grounds, avoiding mental problems and emerging new talents, can be a fruitful idea. I will elucidate my motives in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, the crux of the matter lies in the fact that doing a repetitive task for a worker can be a mundane and boring activity. A routine is lethal for human being. Waking up in the morning, commuting to the work, and doing the same job all the day long, produce serious mental problems and even can results to commit suicide. In fact, unprecedented burgeoning of technology and science, brings about the importance of mental health at workplaces. A recently conducted research revealed that workers who devote all their times doing similar tasks suffer from sundry types of illness. On the other hand, an employee who divide his time to do various task, not only feel satisfied, but also enjoys a peace of mind. Additionally, using different parts of the brain is the fruit of this strategy.
Another salient point in corroborating my stance in this subject is that more favorable task can be a motive to work more efficient as a worker. In fact, an employee who has to do a wide spectrum of tasks, may find a hidden talent to do some tasks and even this opportunity provide the bed-rock for a bright future career. It is commonplace that an employee, even after spending a considerable amount of time, changes his or her career thanks to an opportunity to find their talent in a new vocation. Take my friend's experience as a compelling example. After spending 5 years at a corporate and doing some paperwork, he found his intrinsic talent by designing a graphic work for his company. Afterwards, he pursuit an art course in the university and become a resourceful designer. Had he not done different task on his previous job, he would not have achieved his present career.
To put it briefly, all the enumerated motives mentioned above, converge to the fact that doing different task give rise to a more decent experience at work. It is recommended to have a better efficiency at work, employers put their best to allocate different tasks to their employees and guarantee a healthy workplace for their crew.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 183, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'Rarely' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: Are Rarely
... a proper job for a same motive: money! Rarely are the people satisfied with their job and...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 313, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...ce serious mental problems and even can results to commit suicide. In fact, unprecedent...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, if, may, so, as to, at least, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2238.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 468.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78205128205 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73909288794 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525641025641 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 699.3 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.951166231 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.9 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213646053071 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652162281667 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546929221021 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141946189544 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435247218524 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.002688172 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.