Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Compared with people who live in urban areas, the people who live in rural areas can take better care of their families.
Without a shadow of a doubt, urban and rural lives have significant differences due to the dominant lifestyles in each of them. An unanswered question in this area is whether people living in rural areas can take better care of their families or not. Despite the arguments asserting that urban dwellers are more capable of taking care of their families, I believe otherwise, maintaining that people in rural areas have more opportunities to take care of their families. In the following paragraphs, I will illustrate my viewpoint.
First and foremost, the crux of the matter lies in the fact that urban dwellers have no time to spend it with their families. People have a hectic life, working every day from dawn to dusk in the hustle and bustle of the city. When they get home, they have to accomplish the remained tasks from work, have a dinner, go to bed and get ready for a new day. This cycle repeats every day; meaning that people are occupied with their occupations and they ought to prioritize their tasks to prevent losing their careers. Consequently, they don’t have any time to spend with their families and they surmise the most fruitful thing to do is having a phone call or a video call. Having a brief call once a week, they will not get aware of their family’s obstacles. Thus, it is a far-fetched dream to take care of their families without knowing about their lives’ difficulties. On the contrary, people in rural areas are relieved from arduous tasks associated with their occupations. Some of them are farmers, and some are artisans. Hence, they have plenty of time to spend with their families and assist them in confronting their problems.
Another prominent motive to be stipulated is that in rural areas, people live in the vicinity of each other. Having the same occupations, living nearby is essential to assist each other in career tasks. In contrast, in megacities, people’s offices are located in city’s different parts. Regarding the heavy traffic in urban areas, people tend to live in a place near their office. Hence, members of a family may live in different city spots. When people live next to each other, they inevitably get aware of each other’s lives in meticulous details. Through this, they take care of each other in tough times. Cosider a rural family in which the father is ill. In this case, his sons living nearby can come every morning, accomplish the tasks associated with the farm and cattles, bring food to their father and then go back to their home. As living near their father, whenever he feels uncomfortable, even at midnights, they can come rapidly, and take care of their father with his medicines.
Reflecting upon all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that rural dwellers are more capable of paying attention to their families than urban dwellers are. It is highly recommended to carry out a survey to gain insight into the people’s viewpoint of this question.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 301, Rule ID: HAVE_A_BREAKFAST[1]
Message: When we speak of types of meals, the article is not required: 'have dinner'.
Suggestion: have dinner
...ccomplish the remained tasks from work, have a dinner, go to bed and get ready for a new day....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 179, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended carrying'.
Suggestion: recommended carrying
...s than urban dwellers are. It is highly recommended to carry out a survey to gain insight into the p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, if, may, regarding, so, then, thus, well, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 85.0 52.1666666667 163% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2450.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 502.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88047808765 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5789481953 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488047808765 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 762.3 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8696875563 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2307692308 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76923076923 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385418062278 0.236089414692 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115979014871 0.076458572812 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869345659514 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246526922904 0.150856017488 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103596486607 0.0645574589148 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.