Courses, the founding stone of students' university life, have been valued and even trigger heated discussion over whether students should be required to attend history courses. History modules, in some people's views, are unessential for university students. Contrary to these people's views is my perspective that university students should be required to enroll in history courses due to the contribution to their academic learning and personal development.
What should be prioritized is that setting history courses to be compulsory, compared with making it to be selective, can benefit students' academic life by facilitating getting a wide range of knowledge and sparking their interests. To begin with, prioritizing history courses is conducive to providing students with a great deal of knowledge. To be specific, when getting immersed in learning historic events, such as the modern technology evolution, the second world war, and the discovery of new continents, we can master details of such events, receiving a great quantity of knowledge; on the contrary, such instructions from history could not be obtained by college students if they are not forced to join such history courses. Moreover, by scrutinizing relevant historical materials in the classes, students would gradually have an interest in history. Specifically, when taking history classes, students may find that they have an information gap in this subject matter, which will motivate them to investigate related materials to reduce this gap, encouraging their interests; in contrast, hardly can such motivation occur if students drop history courses freely.
What should be equally worth discussing is that being required to learn history, instead of dropping history courses, is also beneficial for students' development by enabling students to foster time management skills and interpersonal skills. Firstly, by taking history courses, students can foster the quality of persistence. Being required to register for history courses means that some students' workload is increased, stimulating them to better manage their time, such as prioritizing the core tasks, and aiding in establishing their time management strategies; on the other hand, how can students develop time-managing skills if they have a few courses to take? What's more, taking history courses also helps develop their interpersonal skills. In detail, students need to do group projects, such as discussing the origin of an event and making presentations, which force them to cooperate and communicate with others, sharpening their interpersonal skills; by contrast, such skills could hardly be gained if they can take the course freely.
To conclude, students should be required to take history curriculums owing to the benefits of their academic learning and personal development.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ter for history courses means that some students workload is increased, stimulating them...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 667, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...lls if they have a few courses to take? Whats more, taking history courses also helps...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, so, in contrast, such as, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2406.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66117647059 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94847470978 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503529411765 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 732.6 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.6168424822 48.9658058833 203% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 171.857142857 100.406767564 171% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3571428571 20.6045352989 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 5.45110844103 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296427977588 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133789781184 0.076458572812 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521555027299 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213647392161 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.011662685452 0.0645574589148 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 11.7677419355 173% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 58.1214874552 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.1575268817 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.14 10.9000537634 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ter for history courses means that some students workload is increased, stimulating them...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 667, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...lls if they have a few courses to take? Whats more, taking history courses also helps...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, so, in contrast, such as, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2406.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66117647059 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94847470978 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503529411765 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 732.6 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.6168424822 48.9658058833 203% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 171.857142857 100.406767564 171% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3571428571 20.6045352989 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 5.45110844103 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296427977588 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133789781184 0.076458572812 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521555027299 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213647392161 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.011662685452 0.0645574589148 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 11.7677419355 173% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 58.1214874552 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.1575268817 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.14 10.9000537634 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.