Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because, modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize
Compare to some decades ago, life has found a new meaning and style these days and it has become more complex. For having a meaningful life and using of our time wisely, it is important to have a personal life plan and act as it. Some people think it is essential, especially for youth, to know how to plan and this is while others disagree and think we should decide at the moment. In my view, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize and I would like to elaborate on my opinion with a couple of reasons.
First and foremost, by planning, we can do more in less time. As we all now, the speed of life and all actions has increased these days, and we are all in hurry to do all our tasks in a proper time, so it is really necessary to have a plan and act on it. By doing all of our duties as a set plan, we can manage our time better, and by eliminating those hours we waste them in a day, do more efficiently in a shorter time. My own experience is a compelling example of this point. Each semester, when I am planning to study for my final exams, I dedicate almost one day to set a good study plan and I force myself to keep going by that. When I follow my plan, everything goes well and I can even have some free time to spend with my friends, and this is all thanks to my plan which let me to do lots of things in a proper amount of time.
Second, planning can help us to increase the quality of our activities. If we do without a plan and just some random tasks each, we will not see any progress in our life, and it is just because we do not have any set goal which can easily obtain by setting priorities in a good plan. When we think deeply about ourselves and plan based on our personality and potential, we can choose the best ways for doing our works and tasks and gain the best possible results. To bring an example I can mention to my sister’s experience. Two years ago, when she was studying for entrance exam of universities, she took a course regarding planning and self-discipline, and it gave her a good knowledge of setting a good study plan, which its result was getting admission from one of the top universities in our country, Iran. By doing as her plan her brain was well-organized too, and it really helped her to increase her focus and quality of her studying.
To sum up, all I want to say is that we must notice that the life is not like past anymore, and we all have so many tasks to do each single day. If we do not have the knowledge of planning, we cannot have the best use of our limited and precise time, and because our brain is a mess, we cannot concentrate on what we do at the moment. As the result, the bottom line is that, in my view it is essential for all of us, especially young people, to have the ability to plan and organize.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-17 | Vishnupri | 60 | view |
2020-01-12 | naziii | 70 | view |
2019-12-29 | zahra.tmmm | 70 | view |
2019-12-29 | zahra.tmmm | 70 | view |
2019-12-28 | mehdi0222 | 70 | view |
- The passage discusses a painting which is said that is a painting of a well know artist Jane Austen and provides some reasons to support this claim. On the other hand, the professor provides his own reasons and explains why he is against all claims in the 68
- readers has changed 3
- an advertising technique which is called bazzing 3
- The text is discussing salvage logging which defines it as a way we aim to deal with dead trees and remove them and provides three reasons of support. The professor goes against all of the explained reasons and tells us why she is against the text. 73
- work with machines or people? 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, really, regarding, second, so, well, while, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 13.8261648746 217% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 81.0 43.0788530466 188% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2273.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 550.0 407.700716846 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.13272727273 4.8611393121 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39358716243 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.438181818182 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 736.2 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.2334481752 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.631578947 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9473684211 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241958617412 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887853418264 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692632523138 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183120585569 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834625414999 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 58.1214874552 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.27 10.9000537634 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, really, regarding, second, so, well, while, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 13.8261648746 217% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 81.0 43.0788530466 188% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2273.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 550.0 407.700716846 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.13272727273 4.8611393121 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39358716243 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.438181818182 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 736.2 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.2334481752 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.631578947 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9473684211 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241958617412 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887853418264 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692632523138 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183120585569 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834625414999 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 58.1214874552 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.27 10.9000537634 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.