• Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
• Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.
In all civilized societies, all human beings want to be happy and satisfied since these are very crucial factors in people’s lives. Although a plethora of people hold the opinion that nowadays persons are happier than they were in the past, others disagree with this point of view and believe that in the past individuals were happier. Although a certain conclusion cannot be made, I, to a great extent, hold the former viewpoint. Among countless reasons, which can vindicate my point of view, I will mention the two most conspicuous ones through the following paragraphs.
The first reason that juts out of my mind easily at the first moment of thinking about this issue is the fact that technology and science have facilitated people’s lives. In other words, they help individuals to accomplish their daily activities easier than the past. For instance, computer has eased our communications and tasks. People can talk with each other through the internet, and by using a computer whenever they want or like, but in the past, they had to wright letters by hands, and sent it, which was really difficult and time consuming. Consequently, the more facilities become available, the more individuals will pleasure their lives.
The second and equally exquisite proof for this assertion is about this importance that in the present time, people work less than before. Therefore, they have more free time that can spend with their family, and carry out their favorite activities. In this way, they are able to relieve their stress, that lead people to a healthier lifestyle. Conversely, people had very difficult lives in the past. They had to work hard since they could not earn their livings. Hence, their spare time was very short, and they could not spend a lot of time on their hobbies. To give a tangible example, almost people were farmer in the past, and they had to work all day long. It is clearly evident that, at the end of each day, they were very tired, and had no time to spend on enjoyable activities.
To make a long story short, based on the aforementioned arguments, we may draw the conclusion that nowadays people are happier than the past. This contention is due to the fact that not only has technology become more advanced but also people have more leisure time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | Somayya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | Somayya | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | mashghanbar | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | mazenghonem | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | nusybah | 76 | view |
- TPO42Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when do similar tasks all day long. 76
- If there is a way to improve yourself, which one among the three choices you would take?1-Take more exercise2-Eat healthy food3-Reduce the amount of stress 90
- Some university professors let their students to choose their research topic themselves. Some do not. Which one do you agree? 76
- tpo 53Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- TPO-49 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, first, hence, if, may, really, second, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88974358974 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54917320394 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520512820513 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1806101966 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.368421053 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5263157895 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05263157895 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230908358522 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07241680547 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538792172055 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138289661099 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319476875919 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.