do you agree or disagree with the following statement? face-to-face communication is better than other type of communication.
Without any shadow of a doubt, the role of communication in our lives cannot be overstated. This is because Communication has served countless multi-faced functions such as making friends or convey complex thoughts to name but two. the inevitable point, which deserves to be spotlighted, is that with the advent of technology, communication has been subjected to tremendous changes and new ways for communication has been become common namely emails, texting, calling and so forth. With this in mind, there is a fierce controversy as to whether face-to-face communication is better than passive communication or not. As far as I am concerned, the virtues of face-to-face communications significantly outweigh those of passive communication. The reason why I believe so is manifold, among which amending social skills and conveying information in a better manner are considerable.
To begin with, in today's human-oriented world, any individual needs to acquire high levels of social skills, which will be effectively feasible via communicating interactively. in other word, having good social skills will pave the way for future success. one of the efficacious ways to maintain social skills is by practicing face-to-face communication. For instance, as was mentioned before, nowadays, thanks to the evolvement of technology, diverse means for passive communication have become available. because of these passive communication methods, people are now more isolated than before, which caused devolvement of social skills and the lack of social skills is the major reason for loneliness and depression among people. On the contrary, one by communicating in person with other people can make her or his social skills better which has consequences in diverse subjects such as involving in teamwork, diminishing shyness to name but two.
Another privilege of face-to-face communication has to do with delivering massage to other people more accurately. In general, face-to-face conversation is associated with indicating emotion, feelings and most importantly body language. Body language yields invaluable information about people's attitudes or behavior about the topic they communicate about, even if no oral communication involves. Since passive communication detecting body language is not available, it is possible to convey inaccurate information which sometimes accompanied by serious repercussions. Take, for instance, the case of email. It is vivid that email is one of the effective tools for communication and lots of people use email for either personal or formal purposes. However, it is common that transferring massage with email cause misunderstanding. This is because it is not possible to exhibit emotions or feelings in emails. As you can see, through face-to-face communication, people can convey information more accurately.
In a nutshell, with all this into account, I am strongly convinced that face-to-face communication is more beneficial for people in comparison to passive communication, on the ground that this way people can show their emotions through communication which aid information to deliver better and also by face-to-face communication one can practice their social skills.
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? watching television is bad for children. 76
- you have enough money to purchase either a car or a business. which would you choose to buy? 70
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 73
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? people would be happier if they had fewer possessions. 73
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...onvey complex thoughts to name but two. the inevitable point, which deserves to be ...
^^^
Line 1, column 532, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
... in mind, there is a fierce controversy as to whether face-to-face communication is better th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...asible via communicating interactively. in other word, having good social skills w...
^^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...s will pave the way for future success. one of the efficacious ways to maintain soc...
^^^
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...ve communication have become available. because of these passive communication methods,...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: MASSAGE_MESSAGE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'message'?
Suggestion: message
...communication has to do with delivering massage to other people more accurately. In gen...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, as to, for instance, in general, such as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 8.0752688172 372% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2735.0 1977.66487455 138% => OK
No of words: 480.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69791666667 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39993617179 2.67179642975 127% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50625 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 882.0 618.680645161 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.8167613492 48.9658058833 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.318181818 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334966401157 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113399352952 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10819780161 0.0737576698707 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237661686175 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489297616239 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 58.1214874552 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 10.9000537634 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.