A controversy is often raised about the qualities of a good leader. Some groups of people may hold the view that a good leader should implement his own ideas and thoughts. However, others may hold a different view and feel that a good leader should listen to others before taking action. From my vantage point, I concur with the latter groups and feel that leaders should listen to others because of the following reasons.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that a good listener leader increases employees' productivity. An active listener leader can understand what the fierce conservation author Susan scott describes as " the ground truth" which enables leader to understand what is going on behind the scene. Without active listening leaders may lose connection with their employees.This will ultimately results in loss of trust, low employees engagement, and loss of productivity. A vivid example which illustrate by view is the experience I had in my previous job with my manager. His wisdom and open minded personality helped me not only to feel satisfied about my job, but to excel and utilize my full abilities.
However, there are many other benefit leaders provide to organization. No one person including the manager has all the answers, especially in today complex business environment, but the one thing that everybody agrees on is that active listener leaders enhances cooperation between team members. In other words, active listening can create synergy between team members. Thus, instead of every employee work on his own to solve problems, the whole organization would benefit from the experience of employees because listening allow them to share their tactics.
Although the aforementioned reasons are the first to cross my mind at a glance, they are by no means the only reasons available. In fact, there is another subtle reason available. The noteworthy, refreshing, intelligible results of the study published in the American business Journal which showed that active listener leaders bring significant profits to their organizations. The study was conducted on 120 organization of different sectors inorder to prevent bias.
Contemplating the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that organizations without active listener leaders have a lot to lose. Loss of employees productivity, loss of profits, and loss of team work are only a few examples of such losses
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 383, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...ay lose connection with their employees.This will ultimately results in loss of trus...
^^^^
Line 2, column 404, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...th their employees.This will ultimately results in loss of trust, low employees engagem...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 434, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...ltimately results in loss of trust, low employees engagement, and loss of productivity. A...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, thus, in fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2044.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35078534031 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91447680554 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541884816754 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6294713601 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.578947368 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1052631579 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.31578947368 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238792676536 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761658595825 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687924500075 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127329841155 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105296774331 0.0645574589148 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.