Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government should support scientific research that does not have any practical use in the short term
This is a fact that there is a time lag between all the occurrences in this world, especially when there is a cause and effect relationship between them. Although it’s not profitable for governments to give funds on these long term projects, governments should devise a long term plan to aim the goals, however it doesn’t bear immediate results.
To begin with, Many scientific discoveries had a long time difference from the beginning of the study to the time of its application. These type of projects deem to be so ambitious and so optimistic. Therefore many scientists prefer to start working on projects which are likely to reach the end quickly. Throughout the history, the most impressive and great innovations and achievements of human were fruits of notions that were somehow irrational and impossible at the time of their presentation. For instance, invention of mobile phones, the necessity for today’s life, which is an ordinary and cheap electronic device, is consequence of tremendous researches of scientist in many diverse fields. The toehold company which started to produce cellphones was firstly a producer of pagers. these devices were forerunner of modern phones which were didn’t have even a tenth of the modern phone’s abilities. However the US government thought it’s like a waste of money on the plans to develop the pagers to evolve into modern cellphones. After fifteen years, the fundamental basis for producing of a modern cell phone which for the first time gave the user calling ability. Government’s rule in this issue is appreciable, if the company didn’t enjoy the persistent financial support of the government, we still would use pagers to communicate.
Secondly, huge projects which yield to prominent turning points in human life take too much time to give outputs. With the given fact that our planet will be destroyed completely in a far future, one of the most topical issues which is the controversial debate among physicists and astronauts is travel to the other planets in order to save human life from devastation. Although the investigations in this area wouldn’t have any results within at least hundred years from now, it’s the only probable way to keep humankind from extinction. This is not a short term beneficial work anymore, actually it’s something done for its moral aspects. Thereby, governments should provide this kind of researches with the prerequisite resources. This is a fact that perfect results entail considerable effort and support.
To put in a nutshell, however time consuming researches don’t bear timely results, they usually have totally changed the human life. Consequently, governments should allocate relatively sufficient amounts of money to be spent on such projects.
- When you are assigned an important presentation at work or in school you prefer to work on it right away so that you can work on it a little bit every day or wait till you have a good idea 58
- Some items can be made by hand or by machine. Which do you prefer- items made by hand or items made by machine? Use resoans and examples. 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Though people already realized the importance of protecting the environment, it's unlikely that there'll be any difference. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? University should spend more money supporting social activities rather than improving the canteen food. 97
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect in your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.-Wait until the class or meeting is 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...apos;s not profitable for governments to give funds on these long term projects, ...
^^
Line 2, column 201, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...m to be so ambitious and so optimistic. Therefore many scientists prefer to start working...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 796, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...hones was firstly a producer of pagers. these devices were forerunner of modern phone...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 922, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...h of the modern phone's abilities. However the US government thought it's lik...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...apos;t have any results within at least hundred years from now, it's the only prob...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, at least, for instance, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2366.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35294117647 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03639127862 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585972850679 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 734.4 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1677018343 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.3 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130135149583 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401860315026 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442207363625 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877378588227 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193298255692 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.