The benefits of scientific research, in some ways, shape the future of a nation. Thus, supporting scientific research naturally becomes one of the highest priorities of every government. However, it seems that not every research is worth supporting, for some do not have practical use. Some people believe that there is no need for the government to fund these useless researches, but I think this is a misunderstanding.
Researches which seem to have no practical use today may become meaningful, or even revolutionary as time goes by. Governments focusing on programs which provide immediate benefits only are short-sighted, because many so called unpractical researches actually have huge potentials. The research on nuclear materials seemed to be useless and even dangerous in the past, but today they turn out to benefit us in many respects: nuclear power stations can satisfy the increasing need for electricity; radiation can be used to reveal the internal structures of human body and steel. If governments refuse to encourage and fund these advanced researches, we may have no revolutionary progress at all. Since some advanced scientific research cannot produce immediate benefits, individuals or companies are unlikely to be interested, and governments’ supports may be the only chance for this kind of researches. Many countries pay close attention to space exploration, and probes are sent into the space by rockets constantly. Building such facilities and hiring engineers and technicians concerned require an incredibly large fund and various resources, and no organization but governments can afford to do that. Without necessary equipment and facilities provided by governments, these researches with huge potentials cannot be conducted.
Besides requiring money and resources, advanced researches also involve a great number of specialists and experts, and only governments have the power to gather so many talents. We humans have already established a gene mapping database by carrying out an international program which involves six big powers in the world. Such a program cannot be completed by any individual or organization without governments’ backup, because few people are really interested in it due to its lack of immediate benefits, and if governments did not realize its importance, there would be no enough human resource to finish all the tests, calculations and analyses.
Governments should support scientific researches which have no practical use by providing assets as well as human resource, because all the researches will finally benefit us in some way someday.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government should support scientific research that does not have any practical use in the short term 76
- In 20 years from now on, students will not use printed books anymore. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government should support scientific research that does not have any practical use in the short term 76
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 696, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... have no revolutionary progress at all. Since some advanced scientific research ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, finally, however, if, may, really, so, thus, well, i think, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2222.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56892230576 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20992659512 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558897243108 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.0031881146 48.9658058833 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.875 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9375 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245839338368 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891653696372 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633186393551 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177402083328 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058333791344 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 11.7677419355 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 58.1214874552 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 10.9000537634 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.