Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Grades (marks) encourage students to learn. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Educational systems have diverse parameters to provide the best methods for student's performance. Grading is one of the challenging issues that have a prominent role in this regard. Some people believe that students will not have benefits by given grades. Others, including me, have an opposite viewpoint. I firmly believe that students will be encouraged to learn better by giving scores. In what follows, the most outstanding reasons will be scrutinized to clarify the importance of grades.
First and foremost, grades are good indicators for students to be aware of their progress. There is no doubt that students need something to check their educational conditions. Using scores brings them this opportunity to trace different manners related to what they learned before and what they should learn in the future to be successful. Let us consider my own personal experience as an example. When I was an elementary student, our school policy was evaluation students by quality expressions instead of giving marks for final performance. I was always confused with my drawbacks. In fact, there was not an opportunity for me to know in which issues I should improve my performance. However, after the final exams my teachers gave me the fantastic expression, I had several problems with some of my lessons. In face, I did not any strong motivation to read more for learning. Eventually, I decided to change my school for next year. The new school had a different strategy for evaluation by assign marks for each of the lessons and it paved the way for me to have remarkable progress in my lessons. That is why the grading systems are better for students to learn more and effectively.
A furthermore significant point is that, grades help students to identify their mistakes. Having the comprehensive knowledge of the previous mistakes during doing assignments and exams students will be able to modify them to learn better. In other words, they have to study hard and pay special attention to all the related details. For instance, my brother as a high school teacher implements grading for students. He always explains the advantages of marks to students about presented modification in their wrong answers. One of the students could achieve fantastic results in the national entrance exams with these modifications. It prevents making repetitive mistakes by students. On the other hand the other students in another class whose teacher did not give them score for their answers could not persuade students to learn more concepts to have a better performance in the mentioned exam. Had my brother use any other strategy for evaluation of students, they would not have had excellent opportunity to correct their mistakes.
In brief, by taking into account all the aforementioned reasons, it seems that allocation grades to students can be rational method for the learning process. Not only can students trace their progress, but also they have this chance to modify their mistakes. Therefore, it is highly recommended for educational systems to have the most efficient outcomes related to student's activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 366, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...at students will be encouraged to learn better by giving scores. In what follows, the ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...ts will be able to modify them to learn better. In other words, they have to study har...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in brief, in fact, no doubt, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2618.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 504.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19444444444 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8403275018 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494047619048 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 808.2 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4914336703 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2666666667 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149909210311 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457514110946 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365867647676 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10161598101 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144501304016 0.0645574589148 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.