Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
With development of industries and technologies more elite and proffesional people would be needed in educational sector mainly the universities. The issue of university professors' salary is so important that it should not be ignored. Some people believe that their salary needed to be increased. However, there are some other experts who seriously oppose with the idea of salary increase. In my view, I think university teachers deserve better than what is currently happening and their wages must be increased because of two main reasons.
First, society can benefit directly from university professors since they are working for their communities enhancement. Their efforts can raise the money spent in them back in many efficient ways and even increase the budget level for their coresponding government. For example, I worked in a labratory where it was directed by a university professor. It was funded by university itself and the governmental authorities. There were a lot of complains and disapprovals about this lab and professor's income every year. However, when our project finished and we presented it to some potential buyers, every person in the room surprised, since they offered us a significant large number that we cannot ignore it easily. Not only did it compensate for all of our expenses during these research times, but also it covered our next 5 years salary. This company also requested the professor to hire two of our graduate students worked in the lab during the research period. So, as you noticed this increase can benefit so many individuals in the long run.
Second, I believe that people who work in academic field should be supported financially enough to concentrate on bigger problems our society confronts with. If their salaries are not enough to satisfy their goals, they may consider working someplace else or even transfer themselves to industrial sector where they provided their employees with sizable wages to attract them for staying in their company. For instance, my friend Bob worked in a university as a lecturer but he decided to go to work in industrial section since they offer him a good salary which can boost his moral at the first place to encourage him to choose them.
In conclusion, professors have a major role in our community. their salary should be revised for two main reasons. they can add more to money back to system and they should be wiling to stay in their jobs and do not think about other options. Thus, universities should raise their professors salaries gradually which can be logical for both sides.
- A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- Some people pay money for the things they want or need Other people trade products or goods for what they need Compare the advantages of these two ways of obtaining things Which way do you prefer 69
- Should university students be required to attend classes? 83
- do you agree or disagree with this statement? successful people try new things and take risks in their life rather than doing only what they know how to do well. use reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Summarize the points made in the lecture about yellow cedar plants decline, being sure to explain how the man oppose the hypothesis made in the reading passage. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 63, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Their
...ors have a major role in our community. their salary should be revised for two main r...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 116, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...should be revised for two main reasons. they can add more to money back to system an...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2166.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09647058824 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73442339082 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550588235294 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 685.8 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1687911154 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.142857143 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2380952381 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47619047619 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128116132777 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477339594016 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398085233227 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915050113843 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251100479562 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.