Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The issues facing the environment are so complicated that individuals acting alone have no power to affect them Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The issues facing the environment are so complicated that individuals acting alone have no power to affect them. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.

Undoubtedly, environmental problems play a significant role where people work or play. Some people may think that individuals' actions are not very helpful handling with such issues, while other thinks that definitely there are some effective ways that each person can do. If I had to choose one, I will say that there are many things we can do that have a power to affect the environmental issues.

To begin with, reducing the trashes produced from our houses helps reduce the contamination of lands and seas. The volume of wastes each individuals produce may be small, but as they sum up to a large amount, they do have a detrimental effect to the health of our environment. Already, many of wild animals living in either lands or seas suffer from leaked trashes. According to research, however, if we reduce only 10% of our wastes, a lot of wilderness can be preserved and the speed of decreasing in size of available lands will be a lot slower than before. As such, more efforts to control household wastes can largely contribute to the reduction of contamination.

On top of that, by using public transportation such as buses and subways rather than our own cars, we can handle the air pollution quite effectively. It is well known that many kinds of gas emitted by cars such as carbon dioxide have lots of bad effect in our environment. South Korea had been suffered from air pollution, so the government attempted to solve this problem in many ways. One of them was to encourage citizens to use buses and subways. In this context, the former mayor of Seoul had created a vast subway network throughout Seoul, and installed a mangeable system to control it. As a result, more people started to use subways, and the air pollution has been largely decreased since then. Accordingly, by reducing the number of usages of personal cars, the air pollution can be handled pretty effectively.

All things considered, they are many ways such as reducing household wastes or using public transportation we can do that have power to cope with various environmental issues. In this regard, I strongly believe that personal actions can sum up to a powerful influence, making it possible to handle problems in our environment.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-06-13 joon 71 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user joon :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun wilderness seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of wildernesses'.
Suggestion: a lot of wildernesses
...r, if we reduce only 10% of our wastes, a lot of wilderness can be preserved and the speed of decre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, however, if, may, so, then, well, while, as to, such as, as a result, to begin with, on top of that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87598944591 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80209839549 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543535620053 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3898701124 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.705882353 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2941176471 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0959429078218 0.236089414692 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337805936504 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368083624386 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0688057898364 0.150856017488 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256936062769 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.