Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without doubt, in the sophisticated and progressive world in which we live, human beings are equipped with a potent weapon known as knowledge in order to live their lives consciously. There exists a debate among people whether or not having extensive knowledge of many academic subjects are more noteworthy than being professional in one specific subject. Personally, I am of the opinion that getting specialized in one specific field is better than gaining superficial knowledge of various subjects. In the following paragraphs, two reasons to corroborate my idea are provided.
To begin with, getting specialized in one specific field will increase people’s self-confidence when they are talking about topics related to their specialized field of study. In today’s modern world, there are numerous branches of knowledge that each of them, in turn, play a crucial role in human beings’ lives. Because of the vast scope of these branches of knowledge, no one can decisively talk about a particular subject unless she or he conduct an in-depth study concerning that. Consequently, this deep study and specialization will lead them to have confidence in their talks or acts and to be aware of the decisiveness of their claims. If one had superficial and scattered knowledge in various topics instead of being specialized in one, they would always be doubtful about the correctness or erroneousness of their thoughts and talks.
Secondly, specialization in one particular field boosts the chance of getting hired at a job related to that. In this competitive world, everyone is striving to enrich their resume and acquire the career that they love. Obviously, for a specific job position, an employer needs someone who is professional enough in order to diminish possible errors that can damage the company. Therefore between all of the applications, one will win this competition that can guarantee the employer an efficient performance in the job and minimum margin for error which is gained only by being specialized in the field pertinent to the job. My personal experience in being hired for an outstanding company can be a compelling example of this. I’ve studied chemical engineering in college and majored in CO2 Capture and Storage methods. When I applied for a vacancy about the separation of CO2 from the atmosphere at one of the greatest companies in my country, the employer told me he couldn’t find anyone better than me for this position due to my specialization. If I hadn’t majored in that specific field, I wouldn’t have succeeded in getting that specific job.
In conclusion, although some people believe that it is more beneficial for them to have basic knowledge of various subjects, considering the reasons mentioned above, I strongly assert that specializing in one particular field is of paramount importance. Since not only will being professional enhance people’s confidence in what they are saying or acting concerning their major, but also it will improve the chance of getting a job in that field.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 82
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 220, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...sly. There exists a debate among people whether or not having extensive knowledge of many acad...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 444, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'conducts'.
Suggestion: conducts
...t a particular subject unless she or he conduct an in-depth study concerning that. Cons...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ble errors that can damage the company. Therefore between all of the applications, one wi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...n damage the company. Therefore between all of the applications, one will win this competi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, talking about, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2562.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 489.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23926380368 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01506263046 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513292433538 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 796.5 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.5019678177 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.842105263 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7368421053 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52631578947 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217070027137 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749177202365 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776133006982 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151349263716 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0940434951354 0.0645574589148 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.