Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, education plays a principal role in human beings' lives since it is a requirement for achieving success by facilitating the path for being prosperous. In this line of thought, many people believe that having broad knowledge of different academic subjects is better than being specialized in just one specific subject, while many others hold the opposite view. I, personally, concur with the former group for two main reasons, on which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.
First of all, in today's sophisticated world, owning extended knowledge in a variety of field of study in necessary for being successful in life. Indeed, in today's modern era, people more frequently encounter with difficult issues throughout their lives, and dealing with those problems requires them to broaden their knowledge. Specializing in one particular area of knowledge, individuals will have a limited information, which makes it more difficult to go through any obstacles. For instance, today universities projects are more complicated than they were in the past, requiring students to get involved in interdisciplinary majors so as to do these projects. When they are educated in different majors, they can partly use the information gained from each of those majors and find the solution in their academic questions in their papers, essays, and thesis. Therefore, having broad knowledge is necessary for all people for addressing any challenges.
Secondly, having extended knowledge in a variety of academic subjects boost brain's capacity, which in turn improves comprehensive and facilitate the process of learning new concepts. To elucidate this point, since today daily concepts are more arduous than the past to be understand, people need to have better intellectual ability for getting them. When they are ill-equipped, they cannot understand their issues correctly. In this situation, they will be less likely to solve their issues because they are less skillful in all of the subjects that they need to understand concepts. On the other hand, when they learn different academic concepts in different subjects, their broad knowledge helps them to understand any new concepts and information easily in a shorter time, which is beneficial for any individuals. Thus, improving intellectual ability by being taught in a wide range of knowledge can come in handy for people to understand any new information in a less difficult mental process.
To conclude, having extended information and knowledge in various areas of knowledge rather than specializing in one particular subject. Not only is it necessary for human beings to be successful, but it also boosts people's intellectual ability, which facilitates their understanding of any concepts, problems, and issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 637, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...et involved in interdisciplinary majors so as to do these projects. When they are educat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ssues because they are less skillful in all of the subjects that they need to understand c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for instance, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2347.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47086247086 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9989393604 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519813519814 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 728.1 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.0538621938 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.058823529 100.406767564 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2352941176 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192678403602 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729656305125 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929915961754 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144843809914 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630512163192 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.