Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important for the government to provide money for beautiful things and not just for practical things

There are some important landmarks and mascots in many gorgeus cities which are very significant to be conserved. Because, these objects, sculptures, constructions are the heart of the cities and soruce of attraction. That is why, I agree with the statement of governments should provide money for beautiful things and my reasons will be explained in the following essay:
Initially, spending money for practical things is a must as we know. however, this is not a way to increase the value of a city. Because practical things such as transportation, communication and so on must be done in any city since the life standards have risen very sharply. Therefore, there must be impressive distinctions in order to attract the others. Why is that very vital? Because, people go to places to see beauty of views or difference in environments. That leads to increase in income by increasing number of tourists and migration sometimes. People loves to talk about the cities they have visited and beauties they have seen so a city must be ready for any kind of visit in order to gain good compliments and comments.
Another thing that carries an importance is that the beautiful things must be preserved since they consist of history and it is our duty to keep them safe and alive. Next generations have the same rights to see and keep them just like us and that is why we owe them. The historical beauties are the main source to make money for a city. Hence, in order to develop their cities and obtain higher profits governments must provide for beautiful things. Moreover, spending money for beautiful things is has significance to make advertising. Good advertising is one of the most important way to collect groups and payments.
Lastly, seeing beautiful things and living in that kind of environment is a very lovely way to make people happy, joyful and connected to eachother. That will give them the feeling of being grateful to what they have and they will appreciate the government to keep them well. Furthermore, they would feel that they have a vital role to keep these gorgeusness.
As a conclusion, beautiful things are the center of the cities and deserve to be saved for us and future generations.. Therefore, there must be enough amount of money to restore or build them.

Votes
Average: 9 (4 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill be explained in the following essay: Initially, spending money for practical ...
^^^
Line 2, column 70, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... practical things is a must as we know. however, this is not a way to increase the valu...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 735, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to gain good compliments and comments. Another thing that carries an importance...
^^^
Line 3, column 620, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ant way to collect groups and payments. Lastly, seeing beautiful things and livi...
^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...o be saved for us and future generations.. Therefore, there must be enough amount ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, therefore, well, another thing, kind of, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1896.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86153846154 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78187521598 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497435897436 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 591.3 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2563650828 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2857142857 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90476190476 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298531631179 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087784086348 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120152650873 0.0737576698707 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180633210641 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984720788376 0.0645574589148 153% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.