Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
it is important for government to provide money for things that are beautiful, not just for things that are practical.
Nowadays, governments policies play a vital role in country, because of its profound impact on not only society but also the government financial status. In this regard the government divided its tow categories, including practical policies and those aesthetics ones. personally believe if the government focuses on those activities which associate with beauty, its monetary condition will be improve due to fallowing reasons.
Firstly, there is no doubt that beautiful cities can motivate many people from different part of the world to com there and visit the place. The government can convince tourists to come and visit their country by making the appearance of cities and the whole country more beautiful. Since the tourists come to country with money if the government try to improve the quality tourism industry, by establishing parks and making the appearance of cities more green, can earn more money and improve its financial status.
Secondly, the government can establish art galleries and international auctions and give a tax from each art pieces that sold from galleries and auction, so the government can earn money from these art galleries. On the other sides, those countries which don't establish the art galleries and international auction can make advantage of these beauty centers. there are money countries where are famous for their art galleries including France and Italy, where earn lots of money form these art places, which are part of their GDP.
Finally, there are many ideas around weather the government should provide money for things that are beautiful or just for things that are practical, but it seems to me the government should focus on those activities that are related to beauty, because those activities not only attract tourist and money inflow, but also with the help of art galleries and international auction the government can achieve to financial prosperity
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students should take at least a year to work or travel before beginning college Please use specific details and examples in your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing sports teaches people important lessons about life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement it is important for government to provide money for things that are beautiful not just for things that are practical 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Spending a lot of time watching sports on TV and following their favorite team will have a negative impact on one s life 60
- Do you think that young people should have several different types of jobs before they decide on a long term career 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Personally
...cal policies and those aesthetics ones. personally believe if the government focuses on th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... the other sides, those countries which dont establish the art galleries and interna...
^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...make advantage of these beauty centers. there are money countries where are famous fo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...nce and Italy, where earn lots of money form these art places, which are part of the...
^^^^
Line 7, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... art galleries and international auction the government can achieve to financial ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 304.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30592105263 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65349223389 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486842105263 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.9162815588 48.9658058833 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.3 100.406767564 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4 20.6045352989 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203488254774 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765709484967 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849036558002 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135724012085 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107743900799 0.0645574589148 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 11.7677419355 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 58.1214874552 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.11 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.