Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Working is an important part of our lives in order to earn money and to spend life peacefully. Everyone works days and nights to keep their family happy. Some people are inclined toward the attitude that people should work five days a week for a shorter time. No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of working fewer days or more. I personally though, believe that individuals should work three days for long hours. In the following essay, I intend to put forth my points and reasons for support.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that if people work few days long eventually more days off will be given. It is necessary so a person can enjoy a short vacation every week with family. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own experience. When I worked for a private company they call me for 18 hours straight job daily for three days but the rest four days were relaxing. Furthermore, I got a lot of time for my children and took them on vacations out of town. It was really fascinating which takes all my tiredness away whenever I saw my wife and child happy. Therefore, this experience taught me that working longer is beneficial.
Secondly, life is so stressful and people are suffering because of the shortage of time. It is necessary to save time as time is money. If a person works every day for few hours it is absolutely worthless because the whole day is wasted and you do not have enough time to do other stuff. For example, my mother is an office worker and she does the job 5 days a week for 8 hours but when she backs home. My mother does not have enough energy even to go to dinner with us. As a result, she became a patient of depression because of less physical activity as she never had time for such things. Thus, this example elucidates that people shouldn't work 5 days a week.
In light of the reasons mentioned, I strongly agree that working fewer days makes life more enjoyable and entertaining than working a full week. I suggest people should go for jobs that will not effect your health.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 80
- Some people prefer to eat meals at restaurants while others like to prepare and eat food in their own home Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- it is more important for government to spend money to improve internet access than to improve public transportation support your answer with example 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 634, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...us, this example elucidates that people shouldnt work 5 days a week. In light of the re...
Line 4, column 195, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
...people should go for jobs that will not effect your health.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45454545455 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40065769366 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553246753247 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7813306133 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.9545454545 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414066089146 0.236089414692 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112301604669 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880130104184 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261984823472 0.150856017488 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016655411502 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 8.3 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.23 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.