Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is stating the obvious that communication serves a paramount role in a country's circumstances, whether it happens in a virtual space or the real one. Keeping this perspective, if governments should spend money to improve internet access or channel it in modifying public transportation has always been a much debate argument. Despite arguments asserting that governments should improve internet access by spending the budget on it, I believe otherwise, maintaining that government's budget should spend on improvement of public transportation for some underlying reasons.
First and foremost, the crux of matter lies in the fact that spending money on public transportation would improve the environmental circumstances. In simple terms, improvement in public transportation may has effect on the quality of the city's circumstances because of the stuff like air pollution changes. The best example that fits this assertion is increasing the buses quantity in Los angles city which improved the accessibility to any part of the city and at the same time influenced the public health by affecting on environmental problems. Therefore, it goes without saying that any improvement in environmental circumstances which can occur by changing public transportation system, would promote the public health and these matters taking together redound to increasing the efficiency of citizen's life.
In final analysis, in spite of the fact that some might be of this conviction that spending money on internet access improvement would increase public knowledge which is important nowadays for citizens and the whole country, I take issue with them in this regard, and aver that the budget should spend on improvement of public transportation which has practical effect on resident's real life. In closing, it behooves governments to spend the budget on public transportation which impact any individual's life from any aspects.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: A_MUCH_NN1[1]
Message: Maybe you should omit the article "a", leaving only 'much'.
Suggestion: much
...g public transportation has always been a much debate argument. Despite arguments asse...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buses'' or 'bus's'?
Suggestion: buses'; bus's
...t fits this assertion is increasing the buses quantity in Los angles city which impro...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 492, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... public transportation which impact any individuals life from any aspects.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, therefore, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 293.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59385665529 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21734950139 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511945392491 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6003584229 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.3964284901 48.9658058833 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 182.111111111 100.406767564 181% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5555555556 20.6045352989 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269661142369 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126010345358 0.076458572812 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076810105626 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202421932754 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362750437612 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.2 11.7677419355 180% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 58.1214874552 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.1575268817 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 10.9000537634 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.247311828 166% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.