Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It should be mandatory for all teenagers to take a world history class.
It is suggested that all young adults should have a class of globe history in their curricular plan at middle school. No doubt, world history should be a mandatory subject for all teenagers because they will know answers to all their current questions. Furthermore, these lessons will provide a core knowledge about our ancestors, encompass all parts of our existence, and connect facts and names with consequences. However, in practice, children prefer to take more exciting classes (from their perspective) than syllabus about history and the previous generations.
Apparently, kids don't recognize the power of world history and this knowledge's place in their future. By the same token, it would be better if pedagogical experts and representatives of all countries' departments of education will make this decision and prepare this class as mandatory. The study of history is the broadest and significant way to understand the decisions of global leaders, powerful generals, and great people. For instance, comprehension of causes of World War One and Two will improve your skills in understanding human behavior, socialization, and phycology.
Historical memory is also a key for self-identity, connection between event in the past and current situation, and prediction of our future in the so changeable universe. These lessons will provide access to the endowment capital of humanity, common stock of knowledge, and comprehensive cultural literacy. Moreover, students will open a lot of facts about the previous time where were segregation, xenophobe, and dire nation’s events.
However, history is not an only one subject where you could receive a core knowledge about ancestors and descanters, human interrelations, and transformation of legislation, executive, and judicial power in all countries. Consequently, oftentimes pupils should choose between this lessons and more interesting lessons from their point of view, for example, algebra, or social studies with an emphasis on local history.
In the final analysis, the decision about the necessity of this subject is an obligation of university professors and superintendents of the education ministry. Nonetheless, citizens of society, members of parents and teachers’ associations (PTA), and other concerned parties could bring the pressure to bear on the final decision.
- Do you prefer traditional style classes or pre recorded classes 87
- Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 73
- The pie charts provide information on how money was spent by an American average household in 1970 and in 2004 89
- Memorising facts is a superior skill for successful learning Do you agree or disagree 89
- The diagram shows how orange juice is made 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 18, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...previous generations. Apparently, kids dont recognize the power of world history an...
^^^^
Line 2, column 578, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...behavior, socialization, and phycology. Historical memory is also a key for self...
^^^^
Line 4, column 277, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...oftentimes pupils should choose between this lessons and more interesting lessons fr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, for example, for instance, no doubt, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1989.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63456090652 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14893133046 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600566572238 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 10.0 1.86738351254 536% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9619017346 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.6 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5333333333 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 5.45110844103 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230992355417 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702674755309 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761940755519 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109242771407 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102728529303 0.0645574589148 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 10.9000537634 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.