The chart below shows the changes in car ownership in Great britain between 1961 and 2001.
The graph above shows the data about owners and the number of cars in the family during the period from 1961 to 2001.
As can be seen from the chart the there is a steady downfall of the households, who do not own a car. At the same time the number of families who have more than 1 car is gradually rising during the 40 years period. The number of family cells who have only one car is also rising during the period from 1961 through 2001.
There is a negative correlation between the absence and the presence of cars in the households. As the number of closely related people with no cars falls, the number of households with one car or more than one car rises. However, as the peak of 50% of families with one vehicle was reached tin 1981, the following years were represented by the slow decrease in the number of people with 1 car.
In summary, the number of households with one car or more than 1 car grew during the period of 40 years, As the same time the percentage of people with no cars decreased till the point of 30% and came close to the number of households with more than 1 car.
- The diagram illustrates the process of brick production 78
- The given graphs illustrate a waste ratio within the family of UK in 1985 and 2002 84
- Your local government has decided to improve their community Do you think they should A build a public park B build a public library C build a public pool 86
- Social media is becoming increasingly popular amongst all age groups However sharing personal information on social media websites does have a risk Do you think that advantages of social media outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.23333333333 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.1832645261 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.442857142857 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7664690027 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.125 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172200159197 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100393969772 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488029202876 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128994508529 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401826316261 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.55 11.4140731707 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.