It goes without saying that, we as Homo sapiens, live in an age when our lifestyle has undergone profound changes and became more sophisticated. By this definition, the swift and monumental scientific and technological achievements have brought us the opportunity to have a lot of occupational choices to choose from. Conversely, in ancient time people had to work on the jobs inherited from ancestors; so experiencing new environment was impossible. The following essay takes an elaborating look at whether being more skillful is the matter or adapting yourself to the new conditions.
There is no denying that having the sufficient knowledge around the considered task is prerequisite of getting employ. While, if you could not adapt yourself with the existing system you doom to failure. Indeed, first of all you should assess the all circumstances and rules of that organization and compare them with your personality and characteristics. Joining that organization should be done after reaching a firm and logical conclusion. For instance, suppose one has moved other country with different culture and language, it takes some while to adapt oneself with new conditions. If couldn't overcome for problems like homesick he never could expose his talent efficiently.
In addition, the conditions of each job are differing from the others and similarly it is true for personality of each individual. While, the knowledge of a task is constant and does not alter by one to another employee. A group of sociologists and psychologists carried out an investigation at ANU University, to find out being happy with arisen situation is decisive factor of having outstanding skills. They announced that the working duration of adapted staff is about 34 percent more than those have related brilliant proficiency.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned materials we can reach a conclusive conclusion that compatibility is most important that possessing required knowledge. Generally, adaptability is like first floor of a building that if it does not exist the other stages could not be made.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to succeed, you should be more like others than be different from everyone else. (100207CN=081011NA) 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People would be happier withfewer possessions. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To remain happy and optimistic when you fail is more important than achieving success 80
- 48. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important for governments to protect wild animals and wilderness areas for the future generations. 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 592, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...o adapt oneself with new conditions. If couldnt overcome for problems like homesick he ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 682, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er could expose his talent efficiently. In addition, the conditions of each job ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ose have related brilliant proficiency. To wrap it up, according to the aforemen...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ist the other stages could not be made.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, look, similarly, so, while, for instance, in addition, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 331.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33836858006 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17530276066 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643504531722 0.524837075471 123% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8640147167 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.4375 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260235137192 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06638696616 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486910883823 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128290900358 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587125153011 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.