Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, there is a heated discussion on the problem whether parents today are more involved in their children's education than were parents in the past or not. Although parents are more knowledgeable than were those parents in the past, I still contend that in fact, parents are less involved in their kids' education.
To begin with, parents today have less free time to spend with their children. As the competence in the work field is becoming more and more fierce, they have to devote all their energy and time to their job, in order to get promoted and earn a better salary to provide their family with life of higher quality. In such situation, it is difficult for these occupied parents to squeeze time to accompany their children, let alone to take an active part in their education. Meanwhile, it is a prevalent belief in parents' mind that only by working hard and earning more, they can achieve the goal of offering their kids better education. Compared the present situation of parents, parents in the past seem to have more time to spend with their kids, owing to the less fierce competition and slow pace of life, which means they could distribute more time and energy to the kids' education. Therefore, parents at present do not participate in their kids' education so much as the parents in the past did.
Secondly, with the rapid development of society, parents nowadays always find themselves difficult to catch the update of the knowledge on their kids' textbooks, leading to the situation that parents, lacking in the ability to tutor their own kids, ask for professional teachers and tutors to help with their kids' homework. This contributes a phenomenon that it is uncommon to see that, at least in China, some kids do not take part in an extracurricular class after school. Parents are not unwilling to involve in their kids' education but fail to do it. In this case, parents do not play a crucial role in the children's education today.
Granted, parents are involved less in the education of their kids, which never means that they pay less attention to their kids than those parents in the past. On the contrary, it is an era when parents care about their kids' education more than past decades. A great number of researches show that family investment on education having increased about 10% than the last century. They still attach great importance to the education, just suffering from lack of time and ability to involve in their kids' education.
In conclusion, parents today are less involved in their children's education than were parents in the past.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | aymenhamrouni | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | hesam_75 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | kangyan | 90 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | fafar | 90 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- The following appeared in a health magazine published in Corpora."Medical experts say that only one-quarter of Corpora's citizens meet the current standards for adequate physical fitness, even though twenty years ago, one-half of all of Corpora& 59
- Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these c 28
- Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these 16
- Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommend 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 870, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kids'' or 'kid's'?
Suggestion: kids'; kid's
... distribute more time and energy to the kids education. Therefore, parents at presen...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, at least, in conclusion, in fact, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2148.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85972850679 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52956960467 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447963800905 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 663.3 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.5906567532 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.352941176 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391653989054 0.236089414692 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190318328814 0.076458572812 249% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118068475417 0.0737576698707 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.317941398115 0.150856017488 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100458691133 0.0645574589148 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.