Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, it was easier to identify what type of career job would lead to a secure, successful future. (TPO39-Task2)
There has been much discussion around people success in the future and what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future? Some of the people assert that in the past identify the career or job that lead people to succeed in the future is easier than now. According to my experience and actual observation of life have led me to agree with this statement. I have much reason to prove my point.
The first reason and also most important ones I want to say is that, in the last few decades, the technology had great influence in people lives and make everything faster than past and people in their career must have a lot of information about their fields. In the past, everything was simple that now like the education system, administrative system and etc. for example, the past the people who had good education can involve in different companies because the number of people who had good education was less than know and they could easily do their work in the best way possible.
The second, the technology influenced in another field too. The development of technology compelled people to specialize in a different field and adopted themselves with this develop. The number of the company that wants to involved in the different field increased and cause to speared the sense of competition among the company. this sense of competitive makes everything difficult with those company and employee’s that have less fund and popularity rather than other companies.
To sum it all up by taking all the detail into consideration successfully in career is very difficult today rather than any time in the past and in people want to have a successful career in the future must work hard and adapted themselves with the speed of development in a different field. I hope all the people could found their career and be successful in their field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-24 | nahid77777777 | 60 | view |
| 2019-05-24 | nahid77777777 | 60 | view |
| 2019-05-23 | mahyamk | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...ld lead to a secure, successful future? Some of the people assert that in the past identify...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...education system, administrative system and etc. for example, the past the people who ha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d adopted themselves with this develop. The number of the company that wants to inv...
^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...sense of competition among the company. this sense of competitive makes everything d...
^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this company' or 'those companies'?
Suggestion: this company; those companies
...etitive makes everything difficult with those company and employee's that have less fund...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 321.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82866043614 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65818446011 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495327102804 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.0 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.5416020203 48.9658058833 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.230769231 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07692307692 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203954923384 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737847632662 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079429351286 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128670207255 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102743834675 0.0645574589148 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.