Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Since the dawn of modernity worldwide, Intrent plays a crucial role in the life of all contemporary people. In this regard, the governments try to seek provide Internet access as well as they can do. One of the materials still in the debate is whether goverments should prepare Internet network facilities for all people at no cost, such as constructing roads. There may seem to be controversial at first glance. Whie some people free Internet sould be available for the whole societies, others hold colliding viewpoint. I firmly believe that in this situation that Internet network is infancy, people should spend money to access Internet. There are some advantages for this view, and in this essay, I will elaborate on two of my most important reasons.
The first and the most important reason is that still is not provided a proper tutorial for people to use Internet appropiately. There is apparent some people abuse the internet to insult others, to steal and decieve, etc. First should be prepared a space to learn people how to use Internet. Internet is like knife and people can exert it in two facet. People can kill others with knife, on the other hand they can apply it to shed cucumber. Nowdays there is no evidence of the culture of using Internet.
The second noteworthy point I want to mention is that Internet network needs to be invested to grow. Internet is like a child that recently is learnt to creep, and it need money to grow. So governments should care it and provide its insfracture to burgeon. Governments should establish compettitons among corporations in order to reach new technology in Internet domain. These competitions need money and gvernment can fund them if they can sell them to people.
In sum, I firmly believe that Internet should not be free to use. Some causes leed me to this viewpoint, chief amongst them I think still there is not cultural tutarial to teach people how to use the internet. Asides from this reason, Internet need money to grow and this money can be provided by sellin Internet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ard, the governments try to seek provide Internet access as well as they can do. ...
^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
...rst should be prepared a space to learn people how to use Internet. Internet is like k...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'facet' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'facets'.
Suggestion: facets
...ke knife and people can exert it in two facet. People can kill others with knife, on ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, so, still, well, i think, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83760683761 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61130344669 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501424501425 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.5032053378 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.8571428571 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7142857143 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.19047619048 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278997300609 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095971345189 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583226067959 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179673365482 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417200434929 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.