Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without a shadow of a doubt, infrastructures play an integral role in developing a nation either by provding services to people or by enabaling an economy to flourish. Since the construction and operation of different kinds of infrustructures required a vast amount of money, the point here is to devote the government's budget to the things that can have more positive implications on society. In this line of thought, comparing the Internet with other infrastructures, I firmly believe that the former is much more important than the latter. In what follows I will elaborate on my reasons and explain on what rationale my perspective is based on.
The first and foremost reason is that the Internet can provide a huge amount of learning opportunities for people, which neither physical nor soft infrustructures will ever be able to do such a thing in that scale. Clearly, a government can not make any substantial progress in the country, unless it nurture its people to have higher ratio of educated and ingenous persons. More to the point, if we want to improve the life quality of our people, we should have wise people who are able to contribute to the development of the country. The case of Malaysia is a compelling example of this. Being stuck in several challenges, Malaysian authorities were unable to overcome their problems. This was a constant issue until the government decided to change its priorities. Actually, they designated more budget for the public technologies, more pointedly for the Internet. Consequently, after a few years, they saw the signals of promotion in the country. Now it is one of the leading countries in the Technology, all thanks to the widespread use of the Internet.
The second pivotal vindicating reason is that the Internet will ease the connection of people with foreign people that is very critical for having international businesses. While the people start to make interaction with people of other countries and mostly with neighbouring countries, they will be able to cover their needs from resources of those countries. This will also generate a shocking amount of synergy, which will subsequently offer economy of scale and scope. All of these aftereffects will help the economy to flourish.
Furthermore, I think governments have already spent a great amount of money for other traditional services, such as dams, terminals and etc. Now it is the time to alter the focus on modern services like the Internet.
To put it in a nutshell, I am of the opinion that the public sector should subsidized the Internet in order to offer free services to people. This is mostly because it will have many positive effects on the community.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 104, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...a huge amount of learning opportunities for people, which neither physical nor soft...
^^^
Line 2, column 301, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nurtures'?
Suggestion: nurtures
...tial progress in the country, unless it nurture its people to have higher ratio of educ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 133, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ional services, such as dams, terminals and etc. Now it is the time to alter the focus o...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, second, so, while, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2239.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0201793722 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97786970454 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538116591928 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 713.7 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7536265295 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.619047619 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2380952381 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47619047619 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184094592868 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517454015136 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398541907671 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103433021692 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129661634315 0.0645574589148 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.