Do you agree or disagree with the following statement “Should a city preserve or destroy its historic building?” use specific reasons and examples to support your answer?
I’ve known that the development and improvement of buildings in cities play an important role in preparing facilities and conveniences for people but I’ve agreed with this subject that we should keep our old and historic buildings for instance in the case of religion, we must keep old churches, temples, and mosques. We must avoid destroying them for three reasons preserving the history of the city, attracting tourists, keeping the historical documents of the city. Although, changing the shape of the city to modernize causes enjoying people who live in the city and governments can inspire people with historic buildings in the cities.
First, I have the idea that preserving the oldest buildings and keeping the history of cities both of them are so important, because we are not able to build structures and buildings such an ancient people, to keep history and culture we have to avoid damage and destruction of buildings. For instance, when I went to a new city one question comes into my mind is what kind of historical architectures have this city. They remained from several years ago and they inherit from ancestors who had preserved them from invasion and wars for a long time.
Second, one of the most important things that play role in the industrial of tourist attraction is that the perspective of cities where buildings, statues, streets, which show the history, art, and culture of cities to tourists who like to meet foreign country for visiting traditional and historical architecture there. The architecture of the city is so important for attracting tourists who want to look at historic and traditional buildings for learning different cultures of the foreign country. For example, since I visited buildings in other cities, I have always concerned about damaging the buildings’ architecture, I’ve thought that they are valuable for attracting tourists who usually come to countries and cities for looking at these historic buildings.
Third, in my opinion, cities need to have historical documents that have shown authentic and reliable evidence. On the one hand, we have to prevent destroying and damaging old buildings by people and on the other hand, we are not able to gather all the parts of documents and events from the past. I think that it’s a great way of keeping old buildings because they can prove documents and books about them are true. For instance, changing the buildings, houses, and construction in my city has not happened It has improved for a long time since I was in that city.
In conclusion, some reasons such as history, tourists, developing in technology cause to destroy the old and unusable buildings in the city. As a result, in my opinion, one of the important things that lead to attracting tourists is to build new buildings however old buildings make a great view of cities.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement “Should a city preserve or destroy its historic building?” use specific reasons and examples to support your answer? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to be a follower than a leader use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 69
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement “Should a city preserve or destroy its historic building?” use specific reasons and examples to support your answer? 70
- Films can tell us a lot about in which they were made what have you learned about a country from watching its movies? Use specific examples and details to support your response. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement “ In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age.” Use specific reasons and examples to support your answers. 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, second, so, then, third, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2402.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 472.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08898305085 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81821393622 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442796610169 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 725.4 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.8997450158 48.9658058833 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.133333333 100.406767564 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4666666667 20.6045352989 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 5.45110844103 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198081320202 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788781470614 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435460450076 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125602968195 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521717711783 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 11.7677419355 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.247311828 185% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.