or disagree with the following statement “grades encourage students to learn” use specific reasons and examples to support your answer?
Introduction, I oppose this idea that grades encourage students to learn, in this essay, I want to describe my idea into four reasons including competition between students for appearing their skills, try to innovation and invention without issue of grade, making the empathy and sympathy friendly environmental to encourage, making groups for unification in class, assign assessment and evaluation to students, avoid concentration on grade and lose skills, prevent classification in class, making experience and practical condition in class, prevent the sense of preference and priority in class.
At first, I believe that students have competed in the class since they achieved their grades and at last, they stopped competition. I think that grades in a school cause that students don’t raise their skills and talents, therefore, they will not improve their practical knowledge which is so important than theoretical knowledge. For instance, I have tried to learn English since my teacher gave my friends better grades than me in the class I lost my interest in English for learning together. As a result, I fell that the grades in class can’t help to students for practical completion and appearing their skills.
Second, in my opinion, students in class where teacher give grades for exams can not meet characters, creative person, they will limit to grades and can’t imagine and create new science and technology. Therefore, students will be a disappointment in during time and don’t have the best performance even for learning basic lessons in class. For example, if students don’t take grades and score during the term, they will be able to think about innovation and invention of some new robots and the machine in the case of science and technology.
Third, one of the most important reasons that I oppose to this idea is that team working in class. I think that grades form in a class and cause to fight between students, therefore, they will study individually not in the group team. We can enhance the sense of empathy and sympathy in class to make groups for challenging and fighting with problems in class instead of spending time for division students with grades. For instance, If the teachers gave grades and scores to students at the end of exams, some students would be hopeless and as a result, they are not exactly practical. One of the things that teachers can try to look at is creating a competition context without giving score or grade to students.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement “ In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age.” Use specific reasons and examples to support your answers. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement “ In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age.” Use specific reasons and examples to support your answers. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement “Should a city preserve or destroy its historic building?” use specific reasons and examples to support your answer? 40
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement “Should a city preserve or destroy its historic building?” use specific reasons and examples to support your answer? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement “grades encourage students to learn” use specific reasons and examples to support your answer? 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, so, therefore, third, for example, for instance, i think, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2096.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11219512195 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78080443212 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458536585366 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 627.3 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 121.829544322 48.9658058833 249% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 161.230769231 100.406767564 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5384615385 20.6045352989 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121264837294 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565822526679 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349464425403 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859494464703 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243854299273 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 11.7677419355 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 29.5 10.002688172 295% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.