Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public.
In recent years media play a prominent role in societies. People often refer to different kinds of media in order to be aware of the different news. Some people believe that the media do not present the news accurately. While others, including me, have on opposite viewpoint. I firmly believe that the different sources of the news are more accurate than the past. Not only do they try to attract more audiences, but also several organizations check the presented information. In what follows, I will scrutinize the most outstanding reasons.
First and foremost, the more precise news, the more people will be attracted to the source of them. People often tend to follow those media that give them the reliable news. Since it may have profound effects on their routine lives, the media try to pay special attention to this point. For instance, when I was working as a journalist for the local newspaper, I used to report the upcoming events with details. Moreover, I checked the validity of the news before broadcasting. This strategy paved the way for our group to be recognized as the main media in our country. Nowadays, the other kinds of the media try to chase our strategy. As a result, people access to various sources for their understanding of the events. As you can see, the current conditions are more reliable and accurate for the society.
A further more significant point is that the media should pass the different policies that are presented by professional organizations. They have to be responsible for what they spread throughout the country. In fact, when they are subjected to strict rules presented by such institutes, they are forced to be accurate as much as possible. Let's consider my own personal experience to shed a light on this issue. I have a close friend who is the manager of a website. His main task is presentation the latest news about political issues to the public. Whenever he wants to publish something new, he asks his colleagues to allocate enough time to be sure the validity of the news. However, it is often a time-consuming process, he does not have any challenge with the mentioned organizations. Had he published the political reports immediately without any extra supervision, He would not be able to pass the extant rules.
In brief, by taking into account all the aforementioned reasons, it seems that the media try to be more accurate than the past. For sake of the brevity, two main reasons can be considered. The first one is that they will be able to attract more people to their media. Furthermore, several organizations with professional experts supervise them regularly. Therefore, the presented news is more reliable than the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ced to be accurate as much as possible. Lets consider my own personal experience to ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 920, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d not be able to pass the extant rules. In brief, by taking into account all the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, in brief, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2240.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91228070175 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82025388011 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3450849936 48.9658058833 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.6666666667 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 18.0 4.88709677419 368% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192599131945 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548605769111 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516859905389 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131748211807 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461045094951 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.