Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.
In today's progressive world, no one can turn a blind eye to the significant effects of job in our life. Some people are of the opinion that a success in a future job is based in the ability to relate well to people. On the other extreme of the rope, others hold the view that is more important studying hard in school than have this ability. Although both sides take their own positions, personally speaking, I believe that the first group carries more weight. In the following paragraph, I will explain my reasons to justify my points of view.
As the first and paramount reason, having a personality that can provide for people a good relationship in their work, help them to have more confidence to explain their ideas and concepts. In other word, it can be very helpful in their work, because they can expend the horizons of determined problem. Take my experience as a example. When I was working to a marketing company, I used to show my ideas and viewpoints. As a result, I could help my team-work to solve difficult problems. Hence, I got a promotion in my job. If I had not expressed my opinion, nor could I solve problems neither could I earn a promotion.
The second reason coming to my mind to substantiate my viewpoint is that, studying hard in school will is not synonym for success in a future job. To be more specific, I think that when you have the ability to relate well to people, you can develop functional and helpful skill that are necessary to have achieve your personal goals. For instance, an experimental research conducted by a master's scientists shows that the ability of have a great relationship to people exist in the most CEO's of big companies. Therefore, this ability can be very useful in a hit career.
In conclusion, take the above reasons into account, I strongly believe that the virtue to relate well to people not only open up a whole gamut of advantages, but also it is present in the most successful people in the big companies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-01 | Verman94 | 71 | view |
| 2023-02-17 | zaid | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-30 | Umme Abiha | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | anman | 70 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | Kalyani_tekade_24 | 85 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed towards young children aged two to five should not be allowed 80
- Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage The sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Ala 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...termined problem. Take my experience as a example. When I was working to a market...
^
Line 5, column 306, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'achieved'.
Suggestion: achieved
...elpful skill that are necessary to have achieve your personal goals. For instance, an e...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...successful people in the big companies.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60623229462 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68053942185 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521246458924 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3872440774 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6470588235 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7647058824 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260430127877 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769870511199 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08691405416 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170531705256 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0954501125266 0.0645574589148 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.